Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<YANulY_LbB57Rrru4aGMfGuG2Xw@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <YANulY_LbB57Rrru4aGMfGuG2Xw@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <c2fdc44dd6b77812b78bd871c9bde8f3@www.novabbs.com>
 <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <UjtKffdj34rh4B-JrKumzbeGtnc@jntp> <Z5JtI3c-5JMvtNLf7dMsy-PULgc@jntp>
 <qLtiG5g8NZm1g-FnNGAZjmL-3pA@jntp> <PFhIpzW_CY6k7-NpFFWxQ6U3-eM@jntp> <GWVnRHejRmzcWpGcF8X1yi0s9Ok@jntp>
 <fj05Ngld3XDSXUprjPuMp0ivoP4@jntp> <HY4_M296PCimxD1cmAaJLndYXXA@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: HeAikQRC_QYN8iy-2xikxXK07NQ
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=YANulY_LbB57Rrru4aGMfGuG2Xw@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 25 20:39:38 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="7a1acdfaa03ceae2fcc39113260f3e5d01945461"; logging-data="2025-01-13T20:39:38Z/9173840"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 2184
Lines: 16

Le 13/01/2025 à 21:34, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
> [snip idiotic babbling]

> If a theory is not beautiful, it is because it is not true.

The bunch of nonsense you call your "theory" is not only WRONG 
(experimentally AND logically) is is, also, utterly UGLY.

> Je le répète, tu confonds "théorie fausse" et "théorie dissidente". 
> 

You can repeat it, it is still wrong. It is not about "dissidence" but 
about "contradictions" and "nonsense".

You an egomaniac and a crank, Richard. Face it.