Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<YANulY_LbB57Rrru4aGMfGuG2Xw@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <YANulY_LbB57Rrru4aGMfGuG2Xw@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy. References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <c2fdc44dd6b77812b78bd871c9bde8f3@www.novabbs.com> <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <UjtKffdj34rh4B-JrKumzbeGtnc@jntp> <Z5JtI3c-5JMvtNLf7dMsy-PULgc@jntp> <qLtiG5g8NZm1g-FnNGAZjmL-3pA@jntp> <PFhIpzW_CY6k7-NpFFWxQ6U3-eM@jntp> <GWVnRHejRmzcWpGcF8X1yi0s9Ok@jntp> <fj05Ngld3XDSXUprjPuMp0ivoP4@jntp> <HY4_M296PCimxD1cmAaJLndYXXA@jntp> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: HeAikQRC_QYN8iy-2xikxXK07NQ JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=YANulY_LbB57Rrru4aGMfGuG2Xw@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Mon, 13 Jan 25 20:39:38 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="7a1acdfaa03ceae2fcc39113260f3e5d01945461"; logging-data="2025-01-13T20:39:38Z/9173840"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <jp@python.invalid> Bytes: 2184 Lines: 16 Le 13/01/2025 à 21:34, Richard Hachel a écrit : > [snip idiotic babbling] > If a theory is not beautiful, it is because it is not true. The bunch of nonsense you call your "theory" is not only WRONG (experimentally AND logically) is is, also, utterly UGLY. > Je le répète, tu confonds "théorie fausse" et "théorie dissidente". > You can repeat it, it is still wrong. It is not about "dissidence" but about "contradictions" and "nonsense". You an egomaniac and a crank, Richard. Face it.