Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<Y_D4VsycLbS8u2aBR6pMHQmSqBs@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <Y_D4VsycLbS8u2aBR6pMHQmSqBs@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net>
 <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp> <v6mlhe$21277$2@dont-email.me> <9oTvw4-YSIPb1dubtdBwcc_MeX8@jntp>
 <v6ojjl$2fb4i$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: MG9NMLr9S91fJNc0dIhd0A4-8tg
JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=Y_D4VsycLbS8u2aBR6pMHQmSqBs@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 24 12:39:52 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-11T12:39:52Z/8943362"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 2114
Lines: 19

Le 11/07/2024 à 14:36, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> 
> Richard Hachel claims:
> "each [clock] will beat faster than the other,
> both on the outward and return journey"
> 
> This is obviously a nonsensical statement.
> 
> However, I have chosen to interpret the statement like this:
> "Each twin will measure the other twin's clock to beat slower
>   than his own clock, both on the outward and return journey".
> 
> If this (mutual time dilation) were the case, both twin's clocks
> would obviously show the same at the end.
> 
> They don't.

If you say something stupid on purpose, we won't get out of this.

R.H.