Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <YqTjbAPdSf8P-veYFHQCI8eskLU@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Space-time interval (2)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: ZAfcArzD7Wn6XLGwSo9fnP4Xi0A
JNTP-ThreadID: L0IgA2CWtv7gPeDAAk57TJ-BbeQ
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=YqTjbAPdSf8P-veYFHQCI8eskLU@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 24 17:35:41 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-12T17:35:41Z/8984322"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From:  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
Bytes: 3061
Lines: 47

The notion of space-time interval should be abandoned because it is 
complex and leads to nothing, except final errors.
What is the space-time interval?
A metric, measured in meters.
It is mostly an abstract thing that is not very useful.
So we set ds²=dl²-c²t².
Why and for WHAT?
For nothing.
For fun.
Hachel notation is much more practical, because it does not need the 
notion of complexes to establish a perfect Pythagoreanism.
Hachel does not speak, because he is an immense genius, of the notion of 
space-time interval, ridiculous and abstract, and he does not use meters, 
but seconds. That is to say the units of TIME.
This is much more practical because from the invariance of ds, which we 
always wonder what it is, and what it can represent in nature, Hachel goes 
to the invariance of proper times. It is much simpler and more practical. 
A proper time is always invariant because it is a tautology, a truism.

Hachel then poses Tr²=To²-Et² and speaks in seconds, where physicists 
stupidly pose -ds²=-To².c²+dl² and speak in meters.

Finally, what is ds²? It is just -c².Tr²
Let's pose Tr²=-ds².c² and everything becomes much simpler and much 
more practical.

To²=Tr²+Et²

Pythagoreanism is perfect.

In plain language: In a frame of reference, the square of the observable 
time is equal to the square of the proper time of the mobile implemented 
by the square
of the anisochrony taken into account.

Practical example:
A terrestrial observer in a rocket that will travel for 15 years at 0.8c. 
He will therefore age 15 years.
Will the person in the rocket also age 15 years?
We set To²=Tr²+Et²
Hence Tr²=To²-Et²=15²-12²=81
Tr=9 years.

Simplicity is disconcerting.

In general, we don't like it too much.

R.H.