Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <ZREI2r02Uaw2VV_KAUBIKtOt8GI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: The problem of relativistic synchronisation
References: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp> <66c8e830$0$1273$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <dqpXB_Y4YbMyaONpmsZuf-kjUI8@jntp>
 <58a4bfad51ec781e49e708ba7bf0586f@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: VFMiTyfSgysmVjHiEKVYovJH2rM
JNTP-ThreadID: 76aXiNOmFXLuhuEL0ulE9Z2aOsc
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=ZREI2r02Uaw2VV_KAUBIKtOt8GI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 24 23:05:41 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-31T23:05:41Z/9007857"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 3336
Lines: 55

Le 24/08/2024 à 04:26, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 21:13:10 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> Perhaps, but Minkowski spacetime will remain an approximation to
> reality.

> “spacetime is likely to be an approximate description of something quite
> different.” – Steven Carlip



To say that Minkowski spacetime is an approach to reality is a huge bluff.
This is like saying that addition is an approach to multiplication.

A fanatic of the theory of the equality of two operations will tell you
that it is very close, because 1+2 makes three, and 1x2 makes 2; and two 
is not far from three.

So multiplying or adding is the same reality.

This is what a fanatic will tell you.

Then, things will get worse, and Python will come to support:
"But yes, it is the same reality, it is the same operation because 0+0 
makes zero; and if I do 0x0 I still have zero, the equivalence is 
perfect."

And then Paul will come and support: "But yes, multiplying and adding are 
the same thing, we will show that 2+2=4, and that 2x2=4."

Well you see, you do the same thing by saying: "Minkowski is very close to 
reality, because on Galilean frames of reference, it works".

Except that Doctor Hachel, who worked for forty years on the subject, says 
that maybe, but that it no longer works for accelerated frames of 
reference, nor for rotating frames of reference.

It no longer works, but NOT AT ALL!!!

As 4+9 gives 13, and 4x9 gives 36.

13 and 36, it's not the same at all.

Well with Richard Hachel's relativity, we obtain a real relativistic 
perfection. With that of physicists, based on Minkowski, we only obtain 
bullshit.

Poincaré and Hachel: two Frenchmen. A formidable advance in the 
understanding of the universe.

Einstein and Minkowski, two Germans: a formidable derailment of the 
relativistic theory.

Everything is connected.

R.H.