Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 02:12:48 +0000
Subject: Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics
 (running constants)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <GBEGTHyJnMpjHuJ0IoZO0OLSc1M@jntp>
 <0b2ff7832787b9d3165d93803b09df8f@www.novabbs.com>
 <74ipUL6JcQu72w-mbGQ7BbVp7kU@jntp>
 <cda33e42de10aeee9283e500b47a63f9@www.novabbs.com>
 <AE2L2lzGJn13Z_4dg3bpJC59QsA@jntp> <66b3d79f$0$3656$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <ohKdnWfeloC6hyn7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
 <BvmcnQ835vriXir7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <66b7d426$0$8238$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <17ea79aa0bc9fa16$255285$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 19:13:21 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <17ea79aa0bc9fa16$255285$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <_-CcnZ9dvLu9gyX7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 55
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-qo3HK3IZSMjmipEERoDrWaDAApbS2384i1rPkcVBKu7bw5igJzd1BBcFwYlsJegvFZs4AhIjOMEsNxe!Z29ba/N+hXD8bYS5HAF3TO7aVt0FxEJBoNzACbcLo6Of/owKwpkId5bZqCXG0X1dB6hFp7v+Dg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3873

On 08/10/2024 01:59 PM, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> W dniu 10.08.2024 o 22:57, J. J. Lodder pisze:
>> Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/07/2024 06:07 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>> According to Maxwell the field's speed is actually a bit
>>>> greater than 3.06 x 10^8 m/s, ....
>>>>
>>>> Not so much tachyonic though as according to "gravity's speed"
>>>> coming down or braking from the standing electrical field wave.
>>>>
>>>> "... didn't have relativity in order ...", that's rich.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Article the other day, "astonishing new laser-and-thorium setup
>>> reduces the cloud of electron-physics and enables an entirely
>>> new configuration of experiment, that amazingly both refines
>>> and reduces 'what we all thought' as physical constants".
>>
>> [snip more blahblahblah]
>> You really should give direct references.
>> <https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.013201>
>> or the press release with it
>> <https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/nuclear-spectroscopy-breakthrough-could-rewrite-fundamental-constants-of-nature>
>>
>>
>> Summary:
>> They succeeded in exiting a isomeric resonance in the ^{229}Th nucleus
>> at about 8 eV, with a lifetime of about 600 second. (so in the far UV,
>> using a fluorite crystal that is still transparent at this wavelength)
>>
>> This may be used to create a still more accurate frequency standard,
>> hence a clock. (eventually)
>>
>> Nothing very 'amazing' or 'astonishing' about it,
>> just another decade of precision gained,
>> after a decade of hard experimental work,
>
>
> And in the meantime in the real world - forbidden
> by your bunch of idiots improper clocks keep
> measuring improper t'=t in improper seconds.
>

That's among reasons why the, "re-ordering Relativity", bit,
is so rich, so, verdant, ripe, pungent, a rich, rich humus,
which needs a proper apologetics and somebody to explain
how all science still fits all of data when, for example,
2MASS and JWST and even Pioneer have definitely seven-sigma'd
Newton and Einstein put together, while g2 has about log-linear'ed
itself sideways.

Yeah, yeah, I know, "fit the data", ....