Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 13:28:32 +0000
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 09:28:12 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
References: <103jquk$3hu2r$1@dont-email.me> <103js28$3he16$6@dont-email.me>
 <103k32t$3jmvs$1@dont-email.me> <103khk0$3he16$10@dont-email.me>
 <103ljd0$1epb$2@dont-email.me> <103mblo$76oo$4@dont-email.me>
 <103meq4$83ki$2@dont-email.me> <103mjla$852q$3@dont-email.me>
 <103mmqd$9qfj$2@dont-email.me> <103mnp9$852q$6@dont-email.me>
 <103mu89$blrq$2@dont-email.me> <103mubu$bfmd$2@dont-email.me>
 <103o3rd$nqcq$2@dont-email.me> <103p8nk$vtpj$1@dont-email.me>
 <103pctr$10vej$1@dont-email.me> <103pl9r$12qba$2@dont-email.me>
 <103r80o$1gd0s$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Nick Charles
Organization: The Thin Man
In-Reply-To: <103r80o$1gd0s$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <_B6dneK2Zakdovz1nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@supernews.com>
Lines: 48
X-Trace: sv3-NwX6+fu6o3zb9Dq8KiIPjlo4TevrT3LI5QtrI5hp3BeClt/Iqfihp05cPMonUkOUwrofJ60N6Vyx4kf!7jXik3JYcyJJdKv70H4ndONDaZCXCHcyT4j0QKly7ENrZzqflMrYuqx221ES3es8NjZ1EV8Zhvte!Fdo8jOJYlHs=
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40

On 6/29/2025 7:25 AM, R.Wieser wrote:
> Alan,
> 
>> I remember that you told me there was a URL with text you claim was quoted
>> and that it had "wireless" right in the text of the URL
> 
> Ah yes, its my claim, and now I have to prove it - even though you reposted
> that quote, and bitterly complained when I did not re-re-post it.
> 
> And kiddo, if you want me to prove everything, how come you are not doing
> that yourself - like actually quoting where you got that "I remember that
> you told me" from ?
> 
> Yeah, its going to be fun to have you prove to me (and us) that you are not
> as near as bad at finding (your own) claims back as you tried to make me
> (and us) believe. :-)

Jesus.   Why don't you two get a room and masturbate in private?

HERE is the link both of you are arguing about:

<https://www.ifixit.com/News/94409/wireless-charging-trading-efficiency-for-convenience>

Yes, it has wireless right in the URL.  It also concludes - at the very 
bottom of the article - that wireless charging DOES cause more heat 
which COULD result in reduced battery life.  Read the ENTIRE page.  It 
is quite well-done.

Also concludes that things get more inefficient unless the coil in the 
phone is precisely aligned on the coil in the charger.  And that the 
Tesla charger is the worst charger they tested.   Horribly inefficient.

Anyone who knows anything about physics already knows the conclusion 
here.   Wired is THE most efficient way to charge anything AND it 
creates less heat.

Quote:

With that said, our wired charge was the only test scenario where the 
battery momentarily touched 30°C while all our wireless charging test 
scenarios saw the battery warming well above 30°C. You can expect to see 
reduced battery longevity in the case of the Tesla charger or any 
situation where the charging coils are improperly aligned.

End Quote

We now return you to the regular childish bickering, already in progress.