Article <_JYLNvLBI69jcFUh04gSAPBOO8U@jntp>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <_JYLNvLBI69jcFUh04gSAPBOO8U@jntp>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<_JYLNvLBI69jcFUh04gSAPBOO8U@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <_JYLNvLBI69jcFUh04gSAPBOO8U@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of the physics of your idiot guru
References: <17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: FL7ewRi-BpDiCSA9aWTFiuFXTMg
JNTP-ThreadID: 17fa988fc89c527f$104027$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=_JYLNvLBI69jcFUh04gSAPBOO8U@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 24 12:13:33 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="21b58e961d0157c9c18526249011e260673fa78a"; logging-data="2024-10-02T12:13:33Z/9045064"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <python@not-formail.invalid>
Bytes: 2143
Lines: 28

Le 02/10/2024 à 11:25, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
> As seen, the definition of second loved so
> much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
> wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
> lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
> 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
> 
> 
> Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
> solar system is measuring the length
> of solar day. What is the result predicted
> by the Einsteinian physics?
> One prediction is - 99766. From the
> postulates. The second prediction is -
> 86400. From definition.
> And similiarly with the prediction of
> a measurement of a meridian.
> 
> 
> Thank you for your attention, poor
> relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.

Already answered.

You argument is pathetically stupid even for you (low) standards.