Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ltlee1@hotmail.com (ltlee1)
Newsgroups: soc.culture.china
Subject: Western Press Infallibility
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 14:44:44 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <a0876da4b5de80c46ae8ec94523328e1@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="604918"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="mNwqq9k4PbjwCNcW/6mPKUh0i9J+bz8EaUjCd0X/OGk";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$QSmuMgBscLpsOD0zk.YdquVJZ5PpucRIh3bgHiT4pOiK.Y4r1JRYu
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 2fefc04777943c472de9022864bceed983aeb27a
Bytes: 1447
Lines: 15

In article <1725108944.691998@nyx2.nyx.net>, bmoore <bmoore@nyx.net>
wrote:

> And it's a joke to constantly disparage the Western press except when
> their articles support your
> viewpoint.

WHY? Don't quite understand your comment.
Are you saying Western presses are always correct and infallible? OR
they are always wrong?
If not, what's wrong for anyone to disparage any press when it is wrong
and use the articles when it is right?

It is a matter of evidence and reason. Feel free to present your point
of view with evidence and reason. But your comment does not make much
sense.