Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Infinite proofs do not derive knowledge --- Hand in the cookie
 jar --- pants on fire, is Olcott
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 19:56:06 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <a09a1beb182a931e89c89ab7e362b8416c78548f@i2pn2.org>
References: <RpKdnUjg8sjx0Bb7nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <2d0b6260615af8afac79ee8de57bcd45c2f2056f@i2pn2.org>
 <v6fk9p$mr5k$1@dont-email.me>
 <8bd5f2159853ff17ef81b27a85141bccc324e7d9@i2pn2.org>
 <v6fkrb$mr5k$2@dont-email.me> <v6fl9a$mr5k$3@dont-email.me>
 <v6huj5$12ktu$2@dont-email.me>
 <7387a77d06e4b00a1c27a447e2744a4f10b25e49@i2pn2.org>
 <v6i08a$12ktu$4@dont-email.me>
 <c81e1794259853dfd7724900ebfab484679615be@i2pn2.org>
 <v6m42j$1tj30$9@dont-email.me> <v6o0an$2bqh7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6oo1j$2fuva$2@dont-email.me> <v72no8$kinb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v73adp$mjis$19@dont-email.me>
 <359671d4a94f2caa82dc3c4884daa2ff73396a8d@i2pn2.org>
 <v74ner$13bn1$2@dont-email.me>
 <d72aa54790eaa53cbe11dfccca12c67249d0d9f6@i2pn2.org>
 <v75st8$19j7l$1@dont-email.me>
 <0c7d3ace11c3a5a50ac7d7beb8b2091114ad82d3@i2pn2.org>
 <v7788t$1h739$1@dont-email.me> <v77chj$1lkkf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v78f0u$1rc43$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 23:56:06 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3650738"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v78f0u$1rc43$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 6319
Lines: 124

On 7/17/24 8:55 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 7/16/2024 10:07 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 7/16/2024 8:54 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/16/2024 8:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 7/16/24 9:34 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/16/2024 6:53 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/15/24 10:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/15/2024 9:18 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/15/24 10:06 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/15/2024 3:48 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-07-11 13:51:47 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/11/2024 2:07 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-07-10 13:58:42 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/2024 7:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/24 8:28 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every expression of language that cannot be proven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or refuted by any finite or infinite sequence of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> truth preserving operations connecting it to its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meaning specified as a finite expression of language
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is rejected.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tarski's x like Godel's G are know to be true by an 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infinite sequence of truth preserving operations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every time that you affirm your above error you prove
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yourself to be a liar.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is quite obvious that you are the liar. You have not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> shown any error
>>>>>>>>>>>> above.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Richard said the infinite proofs derive knowledge
>>>>>>>>>>> and that infinite proofs never derive knowledge.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That is included in my "not shown above", in particular the 
>>>>>>>>>> word "proofs".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 7/8/2024 7:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>  >
>>>>>>>>>  > Tarski's x like Godel's G are know to be true by an
>>>>>>>>>  > infinite sequence of truth preserving operations.
>>>>>>>>>  >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We cannot know that anything is true by an infinite
>>>>>>>>> sequence of truth preserving operations as Richard
>>>>>>>>> falsely claims above.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are just mixing up your words because you don't understd 
>>>>>>>> that wrores. amnd just making yourself into a LIAR.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Our KNOWLEDGE that the statement is true, comes from a finite 
>>>>>>>> proof in the meta system. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thus zero knowledge comes from the infinite proof
>>>>>>> You spelled "known" incorrectly as "know" yet claimed
>>>>>>> that knowledge comes form an infinite proof.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can't even pay attention to your own words ???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no "infinite proof".
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/8/2024 7:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> *know to be true*
>>>>> *know to be true*
>>>>> *know to be true*
>>>>> *know to be true*
>>>>> *know to be true*
>>>>> by an infinite sequence of truth preserving operations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing can ever be known to be true
>>>>> by an infinite sequence of truth preserving operations.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Right, you just don't parse it right because you don't understand 
>>>> english.
>>>>
>>>> the "by" refers to the closer referent.
>>>>
>>>> it is KNOW TO BE
>>>> TRUE BY an infinite sequence of truth persevng operations.
>>>>
>>>> The infinite sequence establish what makes it True, not what make 
>>>> the truth known.
>>>>
>>>
>>> In other words when you are caught with your hand in the
>>> cookie jar stealing cookies you deny:
>>> (a) That your hand is in the jar
>>> (b) That there is a jar
>>> (c) That there are any cookies
>>>
>>> On 7/8/2024 7:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>  >
>>>  > Tarski's x like Godel's G are know to be true by an
>>>  > infinite sequence of truth preserving operations.
>>>  >
>>>
>>
>> Nothing is known to be true by an infinite sequence of truth
>> preserving operations.
>>
> 
> The bottom line is that you made a mistake and then
> continued to lie about it.
> 

No, YOU made the mistake, and keep on lying about it because you just 
don't understand how English works.

That fafct that you don't dare respond to my posts and include my logic 
in the reply just shows that you KNOW that you are wrong. but your 
seared mind can't stand it.

You are just showing your true nature, that of the stupid pathological liar.