Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as
 non-halting V2
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 13:24:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <a177dd76613794d6bb877c65ffe6c587a8f31bc1@i2pn2.org>
References: <v6rg65$32o1o$3@dont-email.me>
	<97e0632d0d889d141bdc6005ce6e513c53867798@i2pn2.org>
	<v6sdlu$382g0$1@dont-email.me> <v6td3a$3ge79$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6tp1j$3imib$2@dont-email.me> <v6trdu$3irhh$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6tu01$3imib$11@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 13:24:03 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3138994"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2103
Lines: 21

Am Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:04:01 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 7/13/2024 7:20 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 13.jul.2024 om 13:39 schreef olcott:
>>> On 7/13/2024 3:15 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 13.jul.2024 om 01:19 schreef olcott:
>>>>> On 7/12/2024 5:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/12/24 10:56 AM, olcott wrote:

>> You have a wrong understanding of the semantics of the x86 language.
>> You think that the x86 language specifies that skipping instructions do
>> not change the behaviour of a program.
Do you understand that a simulator that aborts does not run forever?

> As soon as the decider correctly determines that itself would never halt
> unless is aborts the simulation of its input the decider is required to
> abort this simulation.
Which decider is aborting here, the simulated or the outer one?
A decider always halts, so it cannot find itself non-halting.

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.