Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<a2b201765d36c4bb6264abb9c3eefc0b@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Definitive Proof that the Corona is Tens of Thousands of Times More Dense than Earth's Atmosphere Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:29:22 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <a2b201765d36c4bb6264abb9c3eefc0b@www.novabbs.com> References: <2a81633665c791fc370acd54b2cea1b0@www.novabbs.com> <a04f26b72e2c50d69282aecdb3466956@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2251169"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$K0VtbLWV9LrIuuX8PQy.uuYbYhZbf29hlz4/ryY0BwQRmd9cAlWgS X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 Bytes: 2765 Lines: 26 "“As Harold Zirin writes in his monograph on the Sun:[80] “On the other hand, we observe that the abundance of the two ions in the corona is nearly equal. […] So, the Saha equation is off by a factor of 100 trillion times.”” [Unzicker, Alexander. The Liquid Sun: A Coming Revolution in Astrophysics (p. 121). Kindle Edition.] “something every practitioner in a lab would call a vacuum.[31] An illusory equation Such a low density is already suspicious, but one should keep in mind that Saha also assumed a local thermal equilibrium. It is disconcerting that his equation, however reasonable from a theoretical point of view, has never been put to the test in a laboratory. Its validity remains entirely conjectural. On top of this, the Saha equation makes grossly wrong predictions regarding the abundance of ions in the solar atmosphere. As the distinguished astrophysicist Harold Zirin points out: [32] “Although errors of such magnitude appear ridiculous, their existence was discovered only in the last 30 years; and the Saha equation is so convenient to use that one may still find it occasionally applied in the current astrophysical literature to problems in the solar” [Unzicker, Alexander. The Liquid Sun: A Coming Revolution in Astrophysics (pp. 45-46). Kindle Edition.] “atmosphere, where it gives errors of factors of millions.” Zirin is quite harsh in his general assessment: [33] “For some years after the discovery of the quantum theory and the Saha ionization theory, astrophysicists were ignorant enough of the problems of nonequilibrium thermodynamics to use these formulas blindly to calculate and explain everything.””