Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Covid's True Origins
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:23:33 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <a2ec0ktffkvjjdpa0cg0bva8e7r0erf710@4ax.com>
References: <8bp50k9l97d32cotcalb3n2hob51044fes@4ax.com> <6803c489$6$2787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <o1080kdk6c3ahncjftafj54p9fjquar5gp@4ax.com> <680415bd$6$14$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6u990kpiua6fu6usmrn3a3n2of7edg2i0p@4ax.com> <680577ad$0$4269$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 14:23:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ed04c3cf606c38476e1fea1ec6e4215b";
	logging-data="2294247"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18DAj2J/inAUxFxZNBhWsGdyeZlA9EWyik="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4M+871l+OvgeyUcLfxD2R7/ckQk=
Bytes: 3387

On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 18:39:46 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

>On 4/20/2025 3:55 AM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>
>>>> Scott all you like. The plain fact is the account on the ZH site is
>>>> true. I remember it all unraveling at the time. ZH broke the story and
>>>> were immediately targeted by all the usual suspects, keen to
>>>> obliterate the culpability of Fauci and the CCP. All good cronies
>>>> sticking together as ever.
>>>
>>> Yeah, if they had any real evidence of anything they'd find someone to
>>> charge with _something_.
>> 
>> It'll come in time. Remember you didn't have a president worthy of the
>> name until only just over 3 months ago and quite understandably he's
>> had plenty of more pressing things to deal with first
>
>I've read a substantial portion of the Slack messages and emails 
>referenced in this article:
>
><https://archive.is/no4P6>
>
>talk about yawn-town.
>
>Seems like Congress discovered academics employed by the CDC under the 
>first Trump administration can believe stupid things as well as anyone. 
>They must be sorta smart though they seemed able to confine being dumb 
>to their Slack messages and not tell everyone who they thought would 
>listen (whether the victim felt like listening, or not.)
>That's a very difficult skill for many people to master it would 
>probably take like 15 years of academic study for the average American 
>to develop it.
>
>"The Republican subcommittee deemed it a co-ordinated 'attempt to kill 
>the lab leak theory'”.
>
>Hey wait a minute I thought there was going to be evidence of a Chinese 
>lab leak here but I guess the best they could produce was evidence of "a 
>conspiracy to kill the lab leak theory" which isn't quite the same thing.
>
>Producing actual evidence of the former might require learning Mandarin 
>for a start and there's almost nobody in all of Congress, much less the 
>R side of the aisle, equipped for that task.

So you don't think there was anything suspicious about the CCP denying
the delegation from the WHO access to the bat virus lab for a
fortnight whilst they removed all the evidence you're now crowing
about the absence of?