| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<a32ea42841dc616462284b590945ed31@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: The physics aphorisms of Arindam Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 01:15:10 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <a32ea42841dc616462284b590945ed31@www.novabbs.com> References: <c596f37eaeac082fce8f501ced6c4cd6@www.novabbs.com> <l0iusk-6k8p.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17fa89eb836365a5$121040$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <rjq0tk-4dhs.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <0f163c5194ace41af71d6c5b3c9641de@www.novabbs.com> <g201tk-f2ps.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <f748b62dd174a60499571fe91f87d5ba@www.novabbs.com> <uof3tk-0vk01.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <75a0474a69c10683e1a5bb4dc558eae7@www.novabbs.com> <08r3tk-0t311.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="465997"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$90c7zIzGppcoSdqaGpOxTOXITQI2EJfUgNg2AHe9gI.1EYTUzIjou Bytes: 3956 Lines: 57 On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 0:59:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 21:43:28 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:03:14 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>> >>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 21:30:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In sci.physics Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>>>>> W dniu 02.10.2024 o 02:51, Jim Pennino pisze: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 9:06:50 +0000, bertietaylor wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What follows from Arindamic physics is the permanent motion machine, >>>>>>>>>>> creating energy indefinitely. A minor version of the workings of the >>>>>>>>>>> universe, where energy is created and disdipated in its infinite >>>>>>>>>>> vastness. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Arindam bets that when he makes such a machine the penisninos (they >>>>>>>>>>> number in billions) will still continue to abuse and ignore him. Frauds >>>>>>>>>>> and fools are like that! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Apes being apes, ape. No matter what nonsense is spouted by beloved or >>>>>>>>>> feared alpha-apes. That explains the success of relativity theories, so >>>>>>>>>> incredibly ridiculous. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The success of relativity theories is because every experiment since >>>>>>>>> 1905 >>>>>>>>> confirms them, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, it is because some fanatic religious >>>>>>>> maniacs like yourself lie experiments >>>>>>>> confirm them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So where is your experiment with data and math that contradicts Einstein >>>>>>> or are you just yet another arm waving and babbling crackpot? >>>>>> >>>>>> The inertia violation experiment using the new rail gun designed by >>>>>> Arindam validates Maxwellian electrodynamics and throws out >>>>>> Einstein-Feynman electrodynamics. As lack of reaction is predicted by >>>>>> F=Bil for the former and NOT by the latter where energy from current >>>>>> moves as particles in a loop. >>>>> >>>>> You mean your silly "expriment" with no data and no math Anirandam? >>>> >>>> Unlike the computer art presented as science by the esteemed e=mcc >>> >>> The first experimental proofs of Einstein's theories were done long >>> before there was any such thing as computer art crackpot. >> >> There are no experimental proofs of Einstein's theories, > > Thousand upon thousand Arindam. Name one.