Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 07:45:25 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <a41ffea382a1c588b717b6362f3e3ac2626bbfe0@i2pn2.org>
References: <vmo1bs$1rnl$1@dont-email.me>
 <3a603a4009f4bdb24c23fc0851757c687e136bc8@i2pn2.org>
 <vmo4s0$22am$1@dont-email.me>
 <a80db53803dda35ea37db12428ecd4a6260a0ebe@i2pn2.org>
 <vmqhj1$v2rb$1@dont-email.me>
 <d3c698a395c33f2cc8568b613888ec4a3c27df4b@i2pn2.org>
 <vmr1e1$12dva$1@dont-email.me>
 <133ef773ac71037ba38a5d922f64822d8f0ef7a3@i2pn2.org>
 <vmvn82$25r19$2@dont-email.me>
 <06783956e11e3791285bfbee537ec1b4ae44100d@i2pn2.org>
 <vn2gq3$2ouuo$4@dont-email.me>
 <d2581d721cc7f8078908c5995acdeb97477ea896@i2pn2.org>
 <vn4t2c$3jlki$1@dont-email.me>
 <d81f167b144587bf13a404c8712b685d55736bd3@i2pn2.org>
 <vn5gpu$3qu1d$2@dont-email.me>
 <52fc5c83ad387e447c8b144d9cea5ac4a5ab181e@i2pn2.org>
 <vna6g3$1ng1j$2@dont-email.me>
 <3161a4187bee594fcf3c7fbe3d0100382d723cff@i2pn2.org>
 <vna9g3$1okeu$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:45:25 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1545483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vna9g3$1okeu$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2458
Lines: 23

On 1/28/25 4:54 AM, WM wrote:
> On 28.01.2025 10:17, joes wrote:
>> Am Tue, 28 Jan 2025 10:02:59 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>> On 27.01.2025 18:30, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Sun, 26 Jan 2025 15:28:14 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>>
>>>>> {1}
>>>>> {2, 1}
>>>>> {3, 2, 1}
>>>>> ...
>>>>> The first column never gets larger than a FISON.
>>>> Neither does it stop.
>>> True. It evolves between finite and ℕ. A variable maximum, "something
>>> becoming, emerging, produced, i.e., as we put it, the potential
>>> infinite." [Hilbert]
>> My mistake. It doesn’t „get” or „evolve”, it just is - infinitely long.
>>
> Not as long as ℕ.
> 
> Regards, WM

Sure it doesm as that is the definition of the symbol ... here,

I guess you admit to being a liar,