Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<a49042e71b1fd5b8f742aa13f598fac5@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mariabus@blueyonder.co.uk (Roger)
Newsgroups: rec.music.rock-pop-r+b.1950s
Subject: Re: CHESS LABEL FAVORITES
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 19:58:31 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <a49042e71b1fd5b8f742aa13f598fac5@www.novabbs.com>
References: <61c6618feb05a1abb0c2f9dcc865912d@www.novabbs.com> <3ca5966bf7c0f621d990875cc31b3b2a@www.novabbs.com> <16f78c7c63d85c9f9d67746fb49b4c20@www.novabbs.com> <f63f8e54a6f929b4131ec87be212dba9@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3846142"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="RdTzbdQMl4AomIx1b1xqthAcwov5mMFuDRq4vmkpdJQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$udk54NrAdEQsSqZ9jNOvheBa7M54hterbfMzsRMjsh5neZTKISMim
X-Rslight-Posting-User: ea0fd7aeb10ce4c545d8ca4480c1c21858dd33aa
Bytes: 2399
Lines: 32

On Fri, 9 May 2025 18:21:59 +0000, Bruce wrote:

> On Fri, 9 May 2025 17:56:33 +0000, Roger wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 9 May 2025 16:58:11 +0000, Bruce wrote:
>>
>>> I think if we go Chess/Checker it could beat Sun/Phillips. There is also
>>> Aristocrat and Argo. Here are my top favorites from the Chess Record
>>> Company.
>>>
>>>> Chess/Checker/Argo released lots of great records in the 60s. Sun's last
>>> great release was in 1958.
>>>
>>> Roger, I know you record collector types want to keep this to the actual
>>> label rather than all labels that each company used, but I don't agree
>>> with that.
>>
>> The basic premise of these posts are "continuing my favorites
>> label-by-label".
>> Thats the way thy're compiled and that's the way they'll appear.
>>
>> So yes there'll be A Checker along the way and an Argo too.
>
> I understand that, but different labels issued by the same company are
> just semantics and trivia. I'm a lot more interested in which record
> companies in total had the best material. Atlantic/Atco/Cat should also
> do very well.
>
> Sam Phillips is gaining an advantage here because his output wasn't big
> enough to require a second label until after the company's prime was
> just about over.

Not so. He had a subsidary label running in 1955