Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<a4a69f9f28eee3d5e8c3d09898b59bfb@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years. Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 00:05:24 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <a4a69f9f28eee3d5e8c3d09898b59bfb@www.novabbs.com> References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="534524"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="hWiuCAeR3KEZYJfTvV11n0qrRi6oqW/zjvEZQQGun9A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$KBUvAlUVldErXyUvz3me6.4zAl1JOmU5.aCo6Rscv7qO.0vxTVm9q X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: f685b96694175b2ad43ead343ead0a9c0082fe88 Bytes: 4368 Lines: 61 What did relativity provide to physics in 100 years, as it was hyper-hyped by generations of physicists covered with more than generous publicity by scientific journals and academia? 1. Even when Einstein was UNABLE to prove in 7 attempts (1905-1946), it was ADOPTED that E=mc2 is true. Very convenient for the simplification of units of measure in physics and chemistry. IT´S FALSE. Just a convention. 2. That inertia (mass) increase with velocity significantly, above v>0.3c. IT´S FALSE, and is mostly abandoned concept since late 1990s. Only a few physicists and school science's teacher persist on this. With dubious methods, and ONLY for charged particles and ions, it was believed to be true by using particle accelerators of many kinds. After all the efforts to prove it experimentally, the concept was abandoned to favor the increase of kinetic energy, while the concept of resting mass was kept due to the use of E=mc2. Still, even TODAY, the rest energy of an electron is calculated (and written in stone) as 0.511 Ev. BUT the problem for the geniuses out there is that the mass of an electron is IRREDUCIBLE, as it's an elementary particle that figures in the Standard Model. And still today, not a single proof of this applied to non-charged particles, atoms, etc. Electromagnetic influence is strongly neglected in particle physics and in the behavior of the Universe and constituents. 3. That Mercury's perihelion extra-advance (beyond Newtonian celestial mechanics) is due to the distortion of spacetime (another invention), caused by the mass of the Sun. This was taken as PROVEN theoretically by Einstein (Nov. 1915), after three consecutive years of very gross failures (with Besso and Grossman). The trick was to GET RID of ALL the celestial bodies, except Mercury and the Sun, using a lame and incorrect approach that TAKES FOR GRANTED the contribution of the remaining planets and satellites,CALCULATED (not measured), using a 100 years theory (Gauss annular approach for each planet's mass). This is a MIX of both Newtonian physics and GR manipulation. Nobody acknowledge that this is FALSE and unscientific, even today. Plus, Einstein integral in the 1915 paper was incorrect, as it didn't take account that perigee and apogee of Mercury were changing while integrating. But most scientists endorsed this nonsense. 4. That gravity bends light. This scam, perpetuated by the Anglo-Saxon establishment and media, lives in infamy, as it was NEVER PROVED in 1919-1920, nor even until today (Shapiro and other degenerates using statistical averages). Yet, even when the phenomena of deflection by large celestial bodies can be explained by using the mathematics of optical effects (350 years old), the current narrative exploit this to expand its use to Black Holes (another crap derived from a singular GR solution), mass of galaxies, etc. 5. That gravity causes red/blue shifting of light. IT´S FALSE and was never proven, not even close. Yet, it's sustained that such conjecture is the explanation of the success of GPS and other GNSS. 6. Academia is deaf and blind about 100 years of controversies. Antagonists or critics of relativity, even the most credible scholars, are threatened to be CANCELLED (cease and desist or else). In this world of lies, the fairy tale of relativity is just ONE MORE subject that is supported at all costs.