| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<a58fb44ec6cf8776dffbf000a6aedb52@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: will.dockery@gmail.com (W.Dockery) Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems Subject: Re: The Return of Michael Monkey Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:47:54 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <a58fb44ec6cf8776dffbf000a6aedb52@www.novabbs.com> References: <KkydnZeHMqdnvwH6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <2c898f8bc382ec1d2d525fab8ff24eb7@www.novabbs.com> <bda26c1f402b9714769751e602435393@www.novabbs.com> <3ce090895c693a4e27b49c23e38626b5@www.novabbs.com> <3cafb20269a45df1b62373fcbbafc741@www.novabbs.com> <6967ba0c1cb7418035d338ebe09efe70@www.novabbs.com> <228ba6c5baab097c6fdc1aa38eb15b7c@www.novabbs.com> <578fa3a51b86cd5fb1d1306497984756@www.novabbs.com> <3f8bf762d2403c568cdca75e7947f4af@www.novabbs.com> <d707956c331796d7bc5a944e380deb65@www.novabbs.com> <2e6a7af2ac4bcd2e72e12efdd5ed79b5@www.novabbs.com> <6e1eb8301376dbc22c08fa8bdf438a8c@www.novabbs.com> <86a28b7f1ce988fd55045b53c510d42d@www.novabbs.com> <32e69be4edba8923dd039f7280d52a3f@www.novabbs.com> <fe004d55d3b5fe993afdf44b82bcdf6a@www.novabbs.com> <68f27da866ee24d21d6dd220f5e02a1b@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3134220"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="Vf9CM7g99yqfGvzEHTw0bhrjcIfvzYBBhUuRma0rLuQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: acd0b3e3614eaa6f47211734e4cbca3bfd42bebc X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$bd1wYZ3BOxcvEdcEkdodXemO7EPwVTUA8/5WcFdATaZO7/CfMRKHu On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:22:53 +0000, HarryLime wrote: > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:59:44 +0000, W.Dockery wrote: > >> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:43:32 +0000, HarryLime wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:08:03 +0000, Will Dockery wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:43:16 +0000, HarryLime wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:55:06 +0000, Will Dockery wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:55:28 +0000, George J. Dance wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 14:29:07 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain aka >>>>>>> "HarryLime" wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 18:01:42 +0000, Will Dockery wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:56:41 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain aka >>>>>>>>> "HarryLime" wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 17:42:27 +0000, Will Dockery wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> MummyChunk wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Again, why do you lie and misrepresent so much, monkey boy Michael >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pendragon? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just curious. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The problem with you is that you lie and misrepresent so much, Michael >>>>>>>>>>> Pendragon. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That simply isn't true >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Of course I don't expect you to admit it, Pendragon. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You know the rules, Donkey: PPSFU (Post Proof or Shut the Fuck Up). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any so-called "misrepresentation" you can find was based on one of >>>>>>>> *your* posts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, so HarryLiar wants proof? Let's look at his next paragraph: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I only know you from what you post here, Donkey. If you write a poem >>>>>>>> based on a "romantic interlude" where you grope a woman you barely knew, >>>>>>>> then I'm going to say that you sexually assaulted her (because according >>>>>>>> to your poem, that's exactly what you did). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Harry Liar reposted an "edited" poem Will had written over 40 years ago >>>>>>> about a dream he'd had. You reposted part of the poem, snipping the line >>>>>>> about it being a dream, to falsely accuse him of sexual assault. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's the thread, so readers can see for themselves: >>>>>>> https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=15788&group=rec.arts.poems#15788 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, George. >>>>>> >>>>>> I see that Harry Lime aka Michael Pendragon is bringing his attacks on >>>>>> me here, spreading his lies and misrepresentations. >>>>>> >>>>>> Never mind the Harry Lime bullocks, here's the original unedited version >>>>>> so the readers can decide for >>>>>> themselves: >>>>>> >>>>>> *** >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I Met A Girl >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I met a girl >>>>>>>>>>>> she came from California. >>>>>>>>>>>> It was in a dream >>>>>>>>>>>> we knew each other instantly. >>>>>>>>>>>> She was a little freckled girl >>>>>>>>>>>> from out of >>>>>>>>>>>> my high school past. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And she looked up at me >>>>>>>>>>>> and talked real spacey. >>>>>>>>>>>> I've forgotten her name >>>>>>>>>>>> though she told it to me twice. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We talked >>>>>>>>>>>> a really detached situation. >>>>>>>>>>>> She said years ago >>>>>>>>>>>> I was so shy >>>>>>>>>>>> she thought I was gay. >>>>>>>>>>>> At this point I kissed her >>>>>>>>>>>> and put my finger to her hole. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And she looked up at me >>>>>>>>>>>> and talked real spacey. >>>>>>>>>>>> I have forgotten her name >>>>>>>>>>>> though she told it to me twice. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't know why it was >>>>>>>>>>>> that I would think of her. >>>>>>>>>>>> I made a couple of puns >>>>>>>>>>>> about her name that made me blush. >>>>>>>>>>>> But her softness in tone >>>>>>>>>>>> made me feel all right. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All I want to do >>>>>>>>>>>> is get in contact. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Will Dockery / May 8 1982 >>>>>> >>>>>> *** >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, this poem was written in 1982, during my time in the Atlanta >>>>>> Georgia New Wave punk rock scene, while also influenced by the earlier >>>>>> Beatnik poets >>>>>> I was reading at the time, such as Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac and >>>>>> Charles Bukowski among others. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both styles employed a sort of crude swagger in the tone and content >>>>>> which I also used in many of my poems. >>>>>> >>>>>> Again, all apologies to those offended. >>>>>> >>>>>> HTH and HAND, again. >>>>>> >>>>>> 😏 >>>>> >>>>> And again, the poem is your attempt to recast what can only be seen as >>>>> an act of sexual assault (at least insofar as it's depicted in your >>>>> poem) as a "romantic interlude" from you past. >>>> >>>> No, that's your attempt to misrepresent the meaning of my poem. >>>> >>>> HTH and HAND. >>> >>> The meaning of your poem (or any given poem) is derived from the words >>> that comprise it. >>> >>> The meaning of your poem is quite clear. It's just not the meaning >>> you'd intended it to have. >>> >>> -- >> >> That's your opinion, Harry. >> >> Others, including myself and George Dance, don't agree. > > Let's take it line by line, Donkey: > > "I met a girl > she came from California." > > This is not a sentence, Donkey. It is two short sentences that you've > pasted together. > > The implication here is that you met her for the first time -- since > you're telling us that she came from California, and you've never been > beyond the states bordering Georgia. > > The second line can be read two ways: 1) she had been visiting > California, or 2) she hailed from California. > > When you take the information from both lines together (even without > trying to force them into a single sentence), it sounds like you just > met a girl who hails from California. > > "It was in a dream > we knew each other instantly." > > Again, this is not a sentence, but two short sentences that have been > pasted together. > > It is a common phenomenon in dreams to "recognize" someone you've never > seen before. This is because the person symbolizes someone from your > life (or is a combination of several people from your life). > > However, the only reason to say that you "knew each other instantly" > would be if knowing each other would not have been expected. > > For instance, if you said that you General Zid at a bar, one would > automatically assume that you "knew one another instantly." > > Generally speaking, when you know someone in real life, it's expected > that you would recognize them on sight. > > Since you felt it necessary to tell us that you "knew each other on > sight," we (as readers) have to conclude that the girl was someone you ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========