| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<a608qjtbf7e0m7160r9lvovibsgpq3et02@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: An offensive defense Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 07:25:08 +0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 43 Message-ID: <a608qjtbf7e0m7160r9lvovibsgpq3et02@4ax.com> References: <vnvt1m$2dl5n$1@dont-email.me> <_uMoP.76516$ZEZf.48316@fx40.iad> <sia7qjhf99f2l7k8rg9hjkkbi4md29inmp@4ax.com> <vo0ask$2g2g4$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 01:25:09 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fce55941aa937ea02ca0d712a03c38df"; logging-data="2761744"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX190AySn6Y4C2BNCGo89XAEAwRl3q2TvZA8=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pp0rLKj4SeGzZATINc0lmBD4F3M= Bytes: 2740 On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 12:32:54 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >On 2/5/2025 12:22 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: >> On Wed, 05 Feb 2025 16:39:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed Feb 5 08:36:39 2025 AMuzi wrote: >>>> https://nypost.com/2025/02/05/sports/driver-says-nhl-star-johnny-gaudreau-and-his-brother-had-been-drinking-before-fatal-accident/ >>> >>> They could call that the "Liebermann defense". Jeff alleges that he is never wrong, >> >> That's not what I said. I said that YOU were always wrong (with a few >> minor exceptions). When describing myself, I indicated that I have >> made a few mistakes and usually apologized to the group for making >> mistakes. >> >>> just as a drunk driver is claiming that his crimial act of driving drunk is not a crime if others are also doing it legally on vehicles that do not offer a danger to others. >> >> What manner of vehicles "do not offer a danger to others" when >> operated by an intoxicated driver? I hope you don't mean a self >> driving car, where blaming the car for accidents has not succeeded in >> the courts. >> >> "Drinking and Self-Driving Cars" >> <https://ggrmlawfirm.com/blog/personal-injury/auto-accidents/drinking-and-self-driving-cars/> >> "There is no exception for drunk driving and driverless cars." > > > > > What manner of vehicles "do not offer a danger to others" > >The dead brothers were on bicycles which make less mayhem on >impact (F=MA and all that). I assume that the argument will be that as they were drunk they MIGHT have dome something wrong that caused the collision... and the Judge will allow it. -- Cheers, John B.