Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<a7qj2jpui6ter96d3ptshbofr6fsq24fq6@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:27:09 +0000
From: boB <boB@K7IQ.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Zilog stopping Z80 production
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:27:08 -0700
Message-ID: <a7qj2jpui6ter96d3ptshbofr6fsq24fq6@4ax.com>
References: <v07k2p$cki9$1@solani.org> <slrnv2f6hk.nch.dan@djph.net> <v089ne$d022$1@solani.org> <l8pq8nF5cteU1@mid.individual.net> <v096bl$1qub6$1@dont-email.me> <khag2jl66dpe9fnmqf0u6qiq31qv98j54s@4ax.com> <v09o60$1uqd3$1@dont-email.me> <8fri2jt9s1o3oef0hcem9l9ql8nku7fdn5@4ax.com> <v0c3fn$2j5pr$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 71
X-Trace: sv3-O9ULkcjqIQBtL2+rfZYeB67fATCM1geRl/6Yec0l502MjBJLz1zcdkifcV3cTOFtvbrBZRswheiwAOB!Vaq+P/pMGtWZXQK5wGOBoguOS5aYK634YGuMB2OAS3DCkGTJThXdXAX3FzZjIgCcSlRaDQLZKN+a!kVmptEw=
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4197

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:09:33 -0700, Don Y
<blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

>On 4/24/2024 1:42 PM, boB wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:44:24 -0700, Don Y
>> <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 4/23/2024 2:40 PM, boB wrote:
>>>> I miss playing with my old home built S-100 CP/M computer around 1980.
>>>> Those were really the fun days of computing and digital logic
>>>> circuits.
>>>
>>> Nowadays, the Zx80's appeal would be in controlling things.
>>> There's little that you can't now do *better* that you would
>>> previously have used a CP/M box for.
>>>
>>>> The other day after hearing the demise of the Z80, I ordered 2 of the
>>>> 20 MHz Z80  40 pin devices.  I did not even know there was a 20 MHz
>>>> version.  Not sure what I will ever do with them but who knows ?
>>>> Maybe I'll just look at them.
>>>
>>> Again, in the context of "control" (i.e., deeply embedded),
>>> you would likely also need similar speed grade peripherals
>>> to do anything.
>> 
>> Yes, I know.  Address decoders are a dime a dozen (almost) and any
>> other peripherals can either be made  or, I may actually have the
>> others laying around.  I save old ICs and have since the 1970s.
>
>But those devices won't be of the same (fast) speed grade as the
>processor.  Remember, all "external (to the CPU) interactions"
>happen at a rate defined by the system clock frequency.  So, the
>RETI daisy chain will have to operate "faster", the devices
>will have to put data onto the bus -- and take it off -- quicker,
>all rate generators (dividers) will have to be rejiggered for a
>faster input clock, any software delay loops (explicit or implied)
>will have to be rewired, etc.
>

The interface isn't that complicated with parts that are available
today to build something.  OR I could just run the part at 4MHz.



>>> I had a particular fondness for the '180 (and '7180!) as it
>>> wasn't crippled by the tiny address space (64K memory + 64K I/O)
>>> of the Z80.  Over the years, I've come to realize that you usually
>>> need more space for *code* than data!

I am not THAT interested in using an obsolete part. Just wanted one. I
may never even use it.

boB

>> 
>> Wasn't familiar with those 2.  Yes, I would run out of code space with
>> many micro controllers.  The was always programmed in assembler and
>> code was fairly smalll at that time.  Amazing we were able to get
>> along with less than 64K !
>
>The 180 gave you a seamless way to get to 1M of program+data.
>(Keep in mind that const data is still data!)
>
>The 7180 was a microcontroller variant -- 16KB EPROM (OTP)
>and 512B of RAM with a smattering of useful I/Os in a
>PLCC package.
>
>There were a couple of other 180 variants that offered
>specialized capabilities but I never had a use for those
>(*too* sole source; the 180 was eventually second sourced
>BY ZILOG  :> )