Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<a8fcljp2otsidm658f0so041fnr0n0rkj7@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Wish me luck Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 19:45:51 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 62 Message-ID: <a8fcljp2otsidm658f0so041fnr0n0rkj7@4ax.com> References: <viv6vt$2e0hk$2@dont-email.me> <lrgm34FajofU2@mid.individual.net> <vivruk$2j3mm$2@dont-email.me> <lri327FigauU2@mid.individual.net> <vj1knt$341kp$1@dont-email.me> <b1h9ljdn06r5vfivu2mm7pg7gmd26n7jmo@4ax.com> <vj5d7m$30up$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 01:45:52 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="69ac0695f1f57c68258dba667e8385e5"; logging-data="111626"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18wGOFcDR2Qcn15sW2fncwMBoIyJe4iByM=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:R0syp3MeOffqhUYsKJS6YVmIREQ= OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote: >>> That's what my system said for the past couple months. 24H2 general >>> release has been around since Oct 1 2024, but I turned off 'Get the >>> latest updates as soon as they're available' and waited for it to come >>> to me. >>> >>> This article describes how MS is rolling it out in phases: >>> >>> https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/is-your-pc-getting-the-windows-11-version-24h2-in-june-or-september-2024 >>> >>> >>> MS haters in Montana are put at the back of the line. >> >> I would have already installed it, even if I were concerned about >> bugs, if they would build on the bloat of 23H2 with buggy general >> releases (how many times now?), > >What you just said makes no sense. Incorrect, an OS judge updates immediately. >> why should I not switch to Linux, > >Considering you spend most of your computing time running Windows apps, >you haven't actually switched to Linux and suffered with the poor choice >you made. Considering that I *DON'T* "spend most of my computing time running Windows apps", your comment is evasive. >> which I'm starting to wonder how you can not wish to? > >Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as >good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible >to give up), and maybe a few games. > >I assume my Canon MG 5220 printer will work under Linux. I don't have >any Windows-only hardware (is that even a thing any more?). Office is one thing. But you have to get tired of bloatware. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.