Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<a8fcljp2otsidm658f0so041fnr0n0rkj7@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Wish me luck
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 19:45:51 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <a8fcljp2otsidm658f0so041fnr0n0rkj7@4ax.com>
References: <viv6vt$2e0hk$2@dont-email.me> <lrgm34FajofU2@mid.individual.net> <vivruk$2j3mm$2@dont-email.me> <lri327FigauU2@mid.individual.net> <vj1knt$341kp$1@dont-email.me> <b1h9ljdn06r5vfivu2mm7pg7gmd26n7jmo@4ax.com> <vj5d7m$30up$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 01:45:52 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="69ac0695f1f57c68258dba667e8385e5";
	logging-data="111626"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18wGOFcDR2Qcn15sW2fncwMBoIyJe4iByM="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:R0syp3MeOffqhUYsKJS6YVmIREQ=
OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

>>> That's what my system said for the past couple months.  24H2 general
>>> release has been around since Oct 1 2024, but I turned off 'Get the
>>> latest updates as soon as they're available' and waited for it to come
>>> to me.
>>>
>>> This article describes how MS is rolling it out in phases:
>>>
>>> https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/is-your-pc-getting-the-windows-11-version-24h2-in-june-or-september-2024
>>>
>>>
>>> MS haters in Montana are put at the back of the line.
>> 
>> I would have already installed it, even if I were concerned about
>> bugs, if they would build on the bloat of 23H2 with buggy general
>> releases (how many times now?), 
>
>What you just said makes no sense.


Incorrect, an OS judge updates immediately.


>> why should I not switch to Linux,
>
>Considering you spend most of your computing time running Windows apps, 
>you haven't actually switched to Linux and suffered with the poor choice 
>you made.


Considering that I *DON'T* "spend most of my computing time running
Windows apps", your comment is evasive.


>> which I'm starting to wonder how you can not wish to?
>
>Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as 
>good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible 
>to give up), and maybe a few games.
>
>I assume my Canon MG 5220 printer will work under Linux.  I don't have 
>any Windows-only hardware (is that even a thing any more?).


Office is one thing.  But you have to get tired of bloatware.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.