Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:26:16 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <a91b3dff88d7ed17e3ddbb401547d2cd6ce69618@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>
 <4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de> <ve0n4i$1vps$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve10qb$1p7ge$1@dont-email.me> <ve117p$vob$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve315q$24f8f$3@dont-email.me> <ve46vu$324$2@news.muc.de>
 <ve5u2i$2jobg$4@dont-email.me> <ve6329$19d5$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve64kl$2m0nm$4@dont-email.me> <ve66f3$19d5$2@news.muc.de>
 <ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org> <09d9f0df-b1bb-42a7-af9b-890bfbcfc581@att.net>
 <b0fa9a1c-8375-4523-a15e-65789688660e@tha.de>
 <3f63bc22-83b2-4d56-9837-849551170c77@att.net>
 <50ac7044-f8c1-47d9-947f-9fa6044e1848@tha.de>
 <68b8be64-7fe8-47e7-a991-7adf14713af5@att.net> <vejmkm$e069$1@solani.org>
 <eb21591a-a60a-4baf-bdbd-afef2a69c230@att.net> <vejte9$e3ds$1@solani.org>
 <53460f91-4542-4a92-bc4b-833c2ad61e52@att.net> <ventec$255vi$2@dont-email.me>
 <venunr$2533b$4@dont-email.me>
 <85cf251afab29f3d64d61a77dd728d0aebdaba96@i2pn2.org>
 <veoshk$2asur$2@dont-email.me>
 <6160c5b40650b2f1d6e03c082a4b8b2eac83d2aa@i2pn2.org>
 <verm26$2s66m$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 01:26:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2518462"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <verm26$2s66m$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On 10/17/24 2:46 PM, WM wrote:
> On 17.10.2024 02:18, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 10/16/24 1:18 PM, WM wrote:
> 
>>> Of course it is a general rule. Doubling creates larger numbers.
> 
>> But those numbers are still in the set, and all the members of the set 
>> were doubled, so none of the doubled values got us to a value that 
>> wasn't doubled.
> 
> Therefore not all doubles are natural.
> 
> Regards, WM

So, what ones aren't?

It is proven that the set of Natural Numbers are closed under 
multiplication.

That is one of the basic laws of simple mathematics.

I guess you are admitting that your logic system has blown itself to 
smithereens, taking out your brain, from the contradictions you have put 
into it.