Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: They actual truth is that ...
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 21:39:10 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <a965e0f825570212334deda4a92cd7489c33c687@i2pn2.org>
References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me>
 <39f1a350cac0a8431753486526da1c35f458df65@i2pn2.org>
 <ve6lsa$207d$2@news.muc.de> <ve8289$336c8$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve91hf$1ab4$1@news.muc.de>
 <7959253e834d2861b27ab7b3881619c2017e199f.camel@gmail.com>
 <ve9ju2$3ar6j$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 01:39:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1485281"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <ve9ju2$3ar6j$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3880
Lines: 70

On 10/10/24 6:19 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 10/10/2024 2:26 PM, wij wrote:
>> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:05 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>> Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-10-09 19:34:34 +0000, Alan Mackenzie said:
>>>
>>>>> Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
>>>>>>> ... after a short break.
>>>
>>>>>>>      Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with
>>>>>>> someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".  So which are you?
>>>>>>> Not sane?  Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone 
>>>>>>> who is
>>>>>>> incapable of conceding them?  Or lying when you describe Peter?  You
>>>>>>> must surely have better things to do.  Meanwhile, you surely noticed
>>>>>>> that Peter is running rings around you.
>>>
>>>>>> In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of the 
>>>>>> truth.
>>>
>>>>> Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, and 
>>>>> doing
>>>>> so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes perilously 
>>>>> close
>>>>> to stalking.
>>>
>>>> Calling a liar a liar is fully justified. I don't know how often it
>>>> needs be done but readers of a liar may want to know that they are
>>>> reading a liar.
>>>
>>> We know Peter Olcott has lied in things that matter.  However, I believe
>>> his continual falsehoods are more a matter of delusion than mendacity.
>>> As Mike Terry has said, OP's intellectual capacity is low.  Calling him
>>> a liar in virtually every post is, I think, unwarranted.
>>>
>>>>> It detracts from the substance of your posts, and makes
>>>>> them, for me at least, thoroughly unpleasant to read.
>>>
>>>> You probably needn't read them.
>>>
>>> As I said, I mostly don't - which is a pity, since Richard Damon often
>>> posts stuff worth reading.
>>>
>>>> As soon you find out that they repeat the same over and over, neither
>>>> correcting their substantial errors nor improving their arguments you
>>>> have read enough.
>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Mikko
>>
>> olcott deliberately lies (he knows what is told, he choose to 
>> distort). olcott
> 
> When the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH is the measure then:

But since it isn't, your whole argument falls apart.

Sorry, you are just admitting to being a liar with that statement.

You have even quoted the definition of halting, and thus show you KNOW 
that you statement is false.


> (a) Each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.
> 
> (b) Each of the directly executed HHH emulator/analyzers that returns
>      0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior of its input.
> 
>