Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: [SR] =?UTF-8?B?V2h5PyA=?=
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 18:55:37 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <a9ce6a08d87164cd99e9d1b296a2fcfe@www.novabbs.com>
References: <LD4K6BjN8LU7EyULcWktoQOIq38@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="523607"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="2U0RwOYzNU+ijpgbVXd5Zmcos0AIe32+I2dWAQYE4iw";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$nuEtH1OED9.ni5UKvZfsEeKxFpPMhE2grYQTx9M/4hsGg7YqewHLu
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
Bytes: 1532
Lines: 15

Richard Hachel wrote:
>
> One of the fundamental equations of the theory of relativity, 
> To²=Tr²+Et², probably even one of the most beautiful in all of science,
> 
> will however pose a small problem for a few months to the greatest 
> theorist of our time: the doctor Richard Hachel.

Hachel failed to define his terms, so that's neither fundamental nor
beautiful.

> A problem will appear to emerge in the development of uniformly 
> accelerated frames of reference, because if we set x=(1/2.a.Tr²+Vr.Tr)
> it no longer works.

If the first equation is relativistic, the second surely is not.