| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<aD2dnamNTPVnGej6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2025 18:10:02 +0000 Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity) Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <881fc1a1-2e55-4f13-8beb-94d1f941b5af@att.net> <vg44QVKbPSR4U0Tq71L-fg5yqgM@jntp> <85194aeb-1b24-4486-8bcc-4dcd43b4fd2f@att.net> <HVudnVg62uHETjv7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <HVudnVo62uGFSDv7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <tR-dnU_G9dTXSjv7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <2e188e21-4128-4c76-ba5d-473528262931@att.net> <NQednW9Dop2vbDr7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <NQednW5Dop3gbDr7nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 10:10:05 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <NQednW5Dop3gbDr7nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <aD2dnamNTPVnGej6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 45 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-fj1G7AXvsXAL6COpLBKqG4UfH0a1ll9Wq70gGUQ252/JCZnnjvSH5FTXWTiE0qZ96YxygHEfvkzrOcA!1p14KtVRHGGoLOoZv8m/jGeq7/cjDscHeha/F1t77NdzJCls0OiKwZaQ4OLLzRVkoFnDSk2jaAo= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3149 On 07/29/2024 12:46 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 07/29/2024 12:44 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 07/29/2024 05:32 AM, Jim Burns wrote: >>> On 7/28/2024 7:42 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>> On 07/28/2024 04:32 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>>> On 07/28/2024 04:25 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>>>> On 07/28/2024 11:17 AM, Jim Burns wrote: >>> >>>>>>> [...] >>>>>> [...] >>>>> [...] >>>> >>>> about ubiquitous ordinals >>> >>> What are ubiquitous ordinal? >>> >>> >> >> Well, you know that ORD, is, the order type of ordinals, >> and so it's an ordinal, of all the ordinals. >> >> The "ubiquitous ordinals", sort of recalls Kronecker's >> "G-d made the integers, the rest is the work of Man", >> that the Integer Continuum, is the model and ground >> model, of any sort of language of finite words, >> like set theory. >> >> It's like the universe of set theory, then as that >> there's _always_ an arithmetization, or as with regards >> to ordering and numbering as a bit weaker property than >> collecting and counting, so that "ubiquitous ordinals" >> is what you get from a discrete world. >> >> Then there's that according to the set-theoretic Powerset >> theorem of Cantor, that when the putative function is >> successor, in ubiquitous ordinals where order type is >> powerset is successor, then there's no missing element. >> >> So, "ubiquitous ordinals" is exactly what it says. >> >> > > Or, you know, "infinity plus one". >