Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <aPHxGjD_dpkbBzSp5qyOiHozthM@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic synchronisation method
References: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp> <vjrvi5$1or3g$1@dont-email.me> <q2T1xxfs2anW3avnE-Mbv6h_TtQ@jntp>
 <vk6it0$2j18$1@dont-email.me> <y6NFsdinreqq-hxcRLvq7hZ4gpc@jntp> <vk92ht$kijv$1@dont-email.me>
 <HQFxpJvcwIpLhNIeMKqLNQ292YE@jntp> <vk9qtr$p308$1@dont-email.me> <6s8YJGP42H0C-4FoL8dk0ahw7GU@jntp>
 <vkrfq7$vgn7$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: 6iMX-kZ5_6KM8bCNOg-9Nf3U1O8
JNTP-ThreadID: YYnLTqUhhEGH779uk7wevDN2vH4
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=aPHxGjD_dpkbBzSp5qyOiHozthM@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 24 17:59:18 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-12-29T17:59:18Z/9157047"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 2987
Lines: 42

Le 29/12/2024 à 13:37, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> 
> Yes, your clear answer to my question was easy to understand.
> 
> My question was:
> "Do you expect your watch to show the same as the clock on
>   the wall of a railway station or an airport?"
> 
> Your answer was 'yes'.
> 
> So you expect the clock on the railway station to be synchronous with
> your clock.
> 
>> 

No.

I do not expect the station clock to be synchronous with mine. I have told 
you dozens of times that two spatially separated clocks will never be able 
to agree on the notion of simultaneity (I have been saying this for forty 
years).

I do not understand your determination to constantly destroy what I say, 
while for my part I never stop explaining to you not only the correct 
things, but also the things as neither Poincaré nor Einstein said them.

But you do not believe me. So we go around in circles and poison the 
words.

I explained to you that the current synchronization is a virtual, abstract 
synchronization, very useful for giving a form of coherence to things.

I said that it was a type M synchronization.

But that it was not the reality of things, even if it was very useful.

You have the same thing with the Mercator projection in geography, it is 
incredibly logical, beautiful, and useful.

But completely wrong locally: Greenland is larger than Africa, which is 
absurd for those who have been around it.

R.H.