Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.27.MISMATCH!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 18:32:50 +0000
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY=
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid>
References: <utks3h$35980$1@dont-email.me> <17c37b6c29057425$4757$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> <25Ccnb-dnerIwo37nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3845f233a098e$3282$2820980$c4d58e68@news.newsdemon.com> <0B2dnfnk4IawGI37nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-A4D504.11411606042024@kd014101080069.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp> <17c3e0882b0394ca$5560$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-8F2975.20213706042024@kd014101080069.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp> <17c40c4736eda3a1$742$1326417$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>
Message-ID: <aYScncSIyKVPe4_7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 18:32:50 +0000
Lines: 42
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-EmxpKWZc79cit7v9ikr+PCeCdDPIInfgO0/epbM+b6d7qRMHJLTmf92CuaTads8w8D4roeMUdeVSEG1!0N/HdmfK2KzPJoBeUiVBrJ95gVoYcgTapwUUAdBZS9rkwO2HzxFznWOFqCo/zUfY4mdp+u+oQVXF
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3644

moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> On 4/6/2024 11:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> In article <17c3e0882b0394ca$5560$3037545$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>,
>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 4/6/2024 2:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <17c3b829d977a4bb$361$1351842$40d50a60@news.newsdemon.com>,
>>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 4/5/2024 7:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>> On Apr 5, 2024 at 3:57:07 PM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 4/5/2024 4:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> What *opinion* -- of anything anywhere -- can't be contradicted?  Fyi,
>>>>>>>>> *that* would be a violation of 'free speech'...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> No one's muzzling or prohibiting you from making contradictory
>>>>>>>> statements regarding the SCOTUS ruling. However, your right to free
>>>>>>>> speech doesn't immunize you from being wrong or bar others from pointing
>>>>>>>> out your wrongness.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ...where "wrongness" means "of differing opinion".
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can have an opinion that SCOTUS decided wrongly and wish it had made a
>>>>>> different ruling but you can't have an opinion that the law is other than
>>>>>> it is.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The 'law' is what SCOTUS has opinions about. I can have *my* opinion
>>>>> about either or both. Therein, the only "wrong" would be a misquoting.
>>>> 
>>>> No, the law is what it is and it's not what you claim. You can have your
>>>> own opinions but you can't have your own facts.
>>> 
>>> No? The law *isn't* text that SCOTUS has opinions about? ...as I may?
>> 
>> No, SCOTUS opinions become the law.
> 
> Including the dissenting ones?

The dissent isn't the opinion of the Court.