Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<ab5eeb643fb2e2aa398d9f73007a007f74346b38@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 23:18:46 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <ab5eeb643fb2e2aa398d9f73007a007f74346b38@i2pn2.org>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <maptLlB5uFyelg509mbdgWw1yGc@jntp>
 <980a0ec7476c9dc5823e59b2969398bd39d9b91d@i2pn2.org>
 <va5c09$3vapv$1@dont-email.me> <h6Deptvp2nWZ7A-WxxE_8LCEIYY@jntp>
 <8d5b0145-b30d-44d2-b4ff-b01976f7ca66@att.net>
 <WtY45o_2xWeSk0s5VFpkO7OO7b0@jntp>
 <bd225e98-2fa5-49d5-806e-f25e2c8f24da@att.net>
 <MyfajwdXdoZZDQyGfKtmPKpt08o@jntp>
 <6cc86827-def3-4948-9e69-a3fea9e86c06@att.net>
 <DjlCrzShAlCRQKbykfy5r-LuUt4@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 03:18:46 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="4162070"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <DjlCrzShAlCRQKbykfy5r-LuUt4@jntp>
Bytes: 1882
Lines: 20

On 8/27/24 3:26 PM, WM wrote:
> Le 25/08/2024 à 23:18, Jim Burns a écrit :
> 
>> Therefore,
>> there is no ω-1,
> 
> If the set of ordinal numbers is complete, then ω-1 precedes ω - by 
> definition.
> 
>>>> Something between ℕᵈᵉᶠ and ω
>>>> does not exist.
>>>
>>> So the blind man argues.
> 
> Or actual infinity does not exist. But then there is no ω, and ℕ = ℕᵈᵉᶠ 
> is potentially infinite only.
> 
> Regards, WM

YOur inability to see them doesn't mean they don't exist, just visible 
in the ultra-WM spectrum.