Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<ab5f2732ee2d6b6eccf5ef4941d098acd27c3d7c@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:39:00 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <ab5f2732ee2d6b6eccf5ef4941d098acd27c3d7c@i2pn2.org>
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
	<cB1y4KsEseyrfvMXAJJ2TijMcX4@jntp> <va31ko$3havl$1@dont-email.me>
	<VqqLFKi62z9rl82Gg4Mxsdp4YYg@jntp> <va4h96$3r7nv$1@dont-email.me>
	<H5iV5HXUBwUzWtVKRZj7h4N2LdA@jntp>
	<ff390a80279179f6d2f4660ed19c150a88c787d6@i2pn2.org>
	<va4rcm$3soiv$1@dont-email.me> <maptLlB5uFyelg509mbdgWw1yGc@jntp>
	<980a0ec7476c9dc5823e59b2969398bd39d9b91d@i2pn2.org>
	<_lFM72wVqiPQLxO8Gf0IkBJtFhw@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 13:39:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3438386"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2106
Lines: 17

Am Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:09:13 +0000 schrieb WM:
> Le 21/08/2024 à 20:15, joes a écrit :
>> Am Wed, 21 Aug 2024 14:53:27 +0000 schrieb WM:
>>> Le 21/08/2024 à 15:51, Moebius a écrit :
>>>> Am 21.08.2024 um 15:13 schrieb joes:
>>>>> Am Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:24:14 +0000 schrieb WM:
>>>> 
>>>>>> Since no unit fraction is below or at zero, the end is before.
>>>> Since there is no smallest unit fraction, there is no end.
>>> The other way round. There is an end, because at and below zero there
>>> is no unit fraction. Therefore there is an end before. Simple as that.
>> Stupid as this: „There is a last negative power of 2.”
> *If there is a complete chain*, then it has a last member.
What do you mean by „complete”?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.