Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<ac24f919972a5e29f1d827dfc6fb4763@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.snarked.org!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!newsfeed.endofthelinebbs.com!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Einstein cheated with his fraudulent derivation of Lorentz transforms Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:56:07 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <ac24f919972a5e29f1d827dfc6fb4763@www.novabbs.com> References: <6eb926ee058330958787e0095602f2b0@www.novabbs.com> <dd838835a5246f47b672d8ff3b86e455@www.novabbs.com> <vnvleh$2ckno$1@dont-email.me> <f0b06654688e0e616a8187f973dd334e@www.novabbs.com> <vo2vvq$32su6$1@dont-email.me> <m0lpnsF3uoeU3@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="------------67a63b2556a1f6.17746881" Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3142771"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$SiRdX52OK0dWFhVLXZeWGuCgoELjmCnB654nkE9P33r6gxly/WE8G Bytes: 91598 Lines: 1550 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------67a63b2556a1f6.17746881 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 7:06:53 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote: <snip Paul's shit> > The meaning of x' is uncertain, because Einstein wrote no proper > definition. > > It is therefore not possible to say, to which system x' belongs and what > physical quantity that symbol shall represent. > > Actually x' should be a coordinate value belonging to system K, because > x is a Latin letter and Latin letters were used for K (Greek letters > were coordinates in k). > > But what meaning was meant to be encoded into x' ???? > > I assume, that x' was meant to be the position of a mirror, because x' > should be the place, where a ray of light gets reflected back to its > origin in the center of k. Please, carefully analyze the attached diagram. I've modified it so x' is a FIXED VALUE on the X axis of K. By doing so, the mirror still remains at x', BUT the thought experiment LAST ONLY the time t=x/v. After that time, the origin ζ=0 HAS PASS x', which is increasingly moving to the left of the origin ζ=0. So, the thought experiment is SHORT LIVED (x/v seconds), because x'=x-vt. Einstein did this TO FORCEFULLY MIX variables from k and K, even when it's temporal. He mixed: 1) The departure of the ray of light from ζ=0, in the MOVING frame K. 2) Placing the mirror on x', he MIXED COORDINATES OF k AND K. HE WANTED THIS. 3) Timing the arrival of the reflection at time τ₂ to ζ=0 has a WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY OF x/v seconds. After that time x/v, the origin ζ=0 is moving at the right of x' (which is fixed in K), at the speed v. So, the thought experiment is EXTREMELY ILL CONCEIVED, and also the assertion 1/2 (τ₀ + τ₂) = τ₁ is FALSE. It's valid only within the moving frame k, because the impact of v speed is NULL. Assuming τ₀=0, and only for the interval x/c, τ₁ = x'/c IN THE MOVING FRAME k. Also, τ₂ = τ₁ + x'/c = 2 x'/c. This VERIFY 1/2 (τ₀ + τ₂) = τ₁ in frame k. BUT, and this is CRUCIAL to keep going, the timing registered in frame K is: τ₁ = x´/(c–v), assuming τ₀=0. τ₂ = τ₁ + x´/(c+v) = x´/(c–v) + x´/(c+v) = 2c x'/(c²–v²) The above MEANS THAT THE EQUATION 1/2(τ₀+τ₂)=τ₁ IS NOT VERIFIED when using values of time registered from the stationary frame K. This FALSE STATEMENT, alone, is enough to throw out the rest of Point 3. Furthermore, the ILL DERIVED EQUATION (HACKING TAYLOR RESULTS) ∂τ/∂x' + v/(c² - v²) ∂τ/∂t = 0 is given the solution τ = a (t-v/(c²-v²) x' WHICH IS CORRECT, BUT WITH FALSE PREVIOUS DERIVATIONS. Einstein continues from this point to deliver QUOTE: "For a ray of light emitted at the time τ=0 in the direction of the increasing ζ ζ = cτ = a (t-v/(c²-v²) x' But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in the stationary system, with the velocity c − v, so that x´/(c–v) = t " END QUOTE Now, with mathematical and physical CRIMES committed, he could follow up further developments to obtain Lorentz. Never forget that Einstein was a master of fallacies and deceptive proposals, mixed with TRUNCATED ASSERTIONS, which served him to hide/disguise THE TRUTH. I always said, for the last 6 years, that Einstein was a fraudster which was MATHEMATICALLY INEPT. However, I always recognized his HIGH EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, which served very well in his short career of 10 years in physics. He had extraordinary capabilities to manipulate people, since college. He was mostly A SALESMAN. He used every used car salesman trick to obtain what he wanted from people around him. This includes his move with acknowledges, crying for help and victimizing him. This is DOCUMENTED in the big database of Einstein's letters, that Princeton put online decades ago. I READ THEM ALL. In this particular 1905 paper, a detailed analysis of the M.O. of WHO'S BEHIND the writings serves as a particular exercise to derive traits of personality. I like doing that, and I used such technique extensively with many scientists. It's incredible how much information can you gather when you analyze writings, even when they are mathematically based. There is a science of profiling behind it. CONCLUSION: Either if x' is a point in the k frame or in the K frame, the result is INVARIANT. He cheated/hacked/misguided all what he needed TO FORCE RELATIONSHIPS between variables in both frames. Target: to obtain Lorentz transforms on his own way. I repeat: only Woldemar Voigt, in 1887, derived a mathematical expression for the Gamma factor, local time and transforms. Other people (like Lorentz and even Poincaré) used them without further explanations. Relativity is a DECEPTIVE PSEUDOSCIENCE, based on PERCEPTIONS and tricky mathematics. Not a single derivation of it has accountability for the author. This is because relativity is a convenient tool to expand physics beyond the original 1905 objectives. Minkowski's formalism of spacetime only made this pseudoscience much worse, backed by mathematics, NOT PHYSICS. > But if x' is a fixed position on the x-axis of K, the subsequent > statements wouldn't make sense. > > Also the equation x' = x - vt would be wrong, because in the context of > the Galilean transform x' has a certain other meaning, for which > Einstein had to use the symbol ξ ('xsi'), because that was his naming > convention. > > Now it gets tricky, because it is actually impossible to assign the used > symbols consistently to one of the two coordinate systems. > > It is, of course(!!!), important in relativity, that the relation of any > variable to the meant system is always clear without any doubt, but that > wasn't the case in Einstein's text. > > Better would have been to use an index (and not Greek letters) to make > clear, to which system a certain variable belongs. > > Also the state of motion (e.g. at rest vs. in motion) needs a sign, ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========