| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<ac3154e57f7f839171a3b3618317bd9b71cafa19@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 07:37:16 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <ac3154e57f7f839171a3b3618317bd9b71cafa19@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org>
<29ce40e9-f18a-44d4-84d9-23e587cf9dea@att.net> <veor6u$2asus$1@dont-email.me>
<2b6f9104-a927-49ee-9cf0-6ee3f82edc23@att.net> <verkkk$2r6kk$1@dont-email.me>
<22f95ff7-c361-4d8a-943c-1df76abb98cc@att.net> <vevpsl$3pi3s$2@dont-email.me>
<ed1862ff-3679-4175-bb25-c317be9713b2@att.net> <vf0t7i$3v3cv$5@dont-email.me>
<9c55eda1-bb24-44ae-9158-2a3b354170cd@att.net> <vf2ck9$amc3$1@dont-email.me>
<30b58bd38b2264ae8ca180a544cc88ee34c6d8fa@i2pn2.org>
<vf33u8$eisc$1@dont-email.me>
<c4edfd4625822f1af9a40daf028fbbd5aab4a225@i2pn2.org>
<vf3mts$i1ai$1@dont-email.me>
<45df31bad2d3e517cb48ab1f0eb7ff6f80999bf3@i2pn2.org>
<vf526v$s8qs$2@dont-email.me> <vf56f2$svda$1@dont-email.me>
<vf58pv$t8hc$2@dont-email.me> <5e5ccee7-0c98-4701-aeaa-4950a3ce2938@att.net>
<vf66bb$125ku$1@dont-email.me> <08a00c75-bf8d-4f9c-816a-83b8517ca04e@att.net>
<vf7mqj$1d3m4$2@dont-email.me> <062a0fa5-9a15-4649-8095-22c877af5ebf@att.net>
<vf8itt$1hosd$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:37:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
logging-data="3315924"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vf8itt$1hosd$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2667
Lines: 23
On 10/22/24 12:12 PM, WM wrote:
> On 22.10.2024 18:03, Jim Burns wrote:
>> On 10/22/2024 4:13 AM, WM wrote:
>
>> ℕ is defined such that
>> n ∈ ℕ ⇔ ∃{0,1,...,n-1,n}
>
> Most of all it is an invariable set with all its elements existing and
> subject to doubling.
>
>> ∀n ∈ ℕ: 2×n ∈ ℕ
>
> Not if all elements are existing before multiplication already.
>
> Regards, WM
IF not, then your actual infinity wasn't actually infinite, and you are
admitting that you logic is just broken.
Your "actual infinity" seems to be just an unimaginably large value, not
infinite, as your actual infinity has an end, it has an element without
a successor, so it isn't the set it claims to be.