Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Gravitational time dilation HOAX along the years
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:31:04 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <ac377b307db816a8230b09bfeb4f602e@www.novabbs.com>
References: <84deac76f160f1f681f5275e10d7e683@www.novabbs.com> <wZqcnbZJrLmAZvz6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3846817"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Ww7FaCXuAd7NgQwO0cChW.uc/d6k45ucRvskf2AtO7FrQPeh7X90C
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 5200
Lines: 94

On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 22:28:45 +0000, Ross Finlayson wrote:

> On 12/17/2024 11:50 AM, rhertz wrote:
>> EXCERPTS FROM EINSTEIN'S 1911 PAPER:  On the Influence of Gravitation on
>> the Propagation of Light
>>
>> ***********************************************************************
>> 2. On the Gravitation of Energy
>> ........................................
>> We consider the process of transmission of energy by radiation from S2
>> to S1 from a system K0, which is free of acceleration.
>> ..................
>> Therefore by the ordinary theory of relativity the radiation arriving at
>> S1 does not possess the energy E2, but a greater energy E1, which is
>> related to E2; to a rst approximation, by the equation:
>>
>> (1)                  E1 = E2 (1 + gh/c²)
>>
>> By our assumption exactly the same relation holds if the same process
>> takes place in the system K, which is not accelerated, but is provided
>> with a gravitational field.
>>
>> In this case we may replace  by the potential gh of the gravitation
>> vector in S2, if the arbitrary constant of ɸ  in S1 is set to zero. We
>> then have the equation:
>>
>> (1a)                  E1 = E2 + E2 ɸ/c²
>>
>> This equation expresses the energy law for the process under
>> observation. The energy E1 arriving at S1 is greater than the energy E2,
>> measured by the same means, which was emitted from S2, the excess being
>> the potential energy of the mass E2/c² in the gravitational field. This
>> shows that in order to satisfy the energy principle we have to ascribe
>> to the energy E, before its emission from S2, a potential energy, due to
>> gravity, which corresponds to the (GRAVITATIONAL) MASS E/c².
>> .....................................
>> 3. Time and the Velocity of Light in the Gravitational Field
>>
>> If the radiation emitted in the uniformly accelerated system K0 in S2
>> toward S1 had the frequency f2 relative to the clock at S2, then,
>> relative to S1, at its arrival at S1 it no longer has the frequency f2
>> relative to an identical clock at S1, but a greater frequency f1, such
>> that, to a first approximation
>>
>> (2)                  f1 = f2 (1 + gh/c²)
>>
>> ******************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>> Since 1911, and for more than 100 years, Eq (2) has remained under the
>> form  Δf/f₀ = gh/c² or equivalent, before or after the 1917
>> Schwarzschild-Hilbert solution in GR.
>>
>> 1911, Einstein:   Δf/f₀ = gh/c²   (light has mass E/c², asserted
>> Einstein)
>>
>> 1959, Pound-Rebka: Δf/f₀ = gh/c²   (Is Einstein right with light having
>> mass?)
>>
>> 1971, Hafele-Keating:  Δτ/τ₀ = gh/c² (Is Einstein right with GR time
>> dilation?)
>>
>> 2015, Mudrak et. all:  Δf/f₀ = GMₑ/c² [(a - r)/(ar) + J₂/2] ≈ gh/c²  (if
>> a ≈ r)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ALL OF THE AB0VE CRAP IS FALSE, AND CAN BE TRACED BACK TO THE 1907-1911
>> PERIOD, WHEN THE RETARDED TRIED TO INCORPORATE GRAVITY TO SR.
>>
>> BY 1915-1917, THE SCHWARZSCHILS-HILBERT PARTICULAR SOLUTION EMERGED,
>> WITH A VERY SPECIFIC CONTEXT FOR APPLICABILITY. IN PARTICULAR, THE SUN
>> WAS MODELED AS A
>> NON-ROTATING POINT-LIKE MASS, WITH MERCURY AS A MASSLESS TEST PARTICLE.
>>
>> YET, RELATIVISTIC MORONS INSIST ON APPLYING IT TO EVERYTHING ABOVE THE
>> EARTH'S SURFACE. EITHER MOVING OR STATIC. BECAUSE THEY ARE IMMORAL
>> SOLD-OUTS, THAT SAW A COW TO BE MILKED TO ITS DEATH, WHILE THEY'RE
>> PROFITING IN MANY WAYS.
>>
>> THE PSEUDO-SCIENCE OF RELATIVISM IS USED BY PARASITES TO HAVE A NICE AND
>> UNACCOUNTABLE WAY OF LIVING. THEY ALSO RELY ON AMATEURS FOLLOWERS OF THE
>> CULT, TO SPREAD THEIR SHIT, TRUSTING IN THEIR BORN IMBECILITY AS
>> GULLIBLE CRETINS.
>
> Actually space-contraction after motion was arrived
> at long before that, where what you're looking at
> is ten different things mashed into a muddy wad,
> and what you're looking at is what _you're_ seeing.
Length contraction was one of the first proposed solutions for saving
the ether from the MMX, and was the first discarded as ad hoc nonsense,
and rightly so.