Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:45:59 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <ac8e79f3bfccf996ed94acec6c9d056d@www.novabbs.com>
References: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <44a0c174e98bcb204982ca1542045eb5@www.novabbs.com> <17efef197ca115f7$564361$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <b6f1cb0f72b80a064eb89c8d383852b4@www.novabbs.com> <17eff781fb02a799$603310$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <e3e93c5d0032dfb9acd3a84593eb44ec@www.novabbs.com> <17effbe45cdbfe84$690840$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <4cefb9225d4d51ae0e2d9e8c0c84e75b@www.novabbs.com> <17f01805bc4de11f$605911$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <45fd375adfc18f18878cefa21e4f4b95@www.novabbs.com> <17f03370b4565f4b$579417$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <d9c926a6c9fcb082495c9bd118e9bf08@www.novabbs.com> <17f038d71e55acff$584760$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <ad841da0a6ecd1268af33e012b996cd3@www.novabbs.com> <17f0447be1dca708$639122$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="178059"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$HSYrgiXfB7OTNTJ47hlD7u5NsowavezQabdn3ks6WdNuNjR00ngZO
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 5325
Lines: 104

On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 17:52:38 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 29.08.2024 o 18:37, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:19:16 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > But did they exist before Riemann declared his idiocies?
> > > If they did they change much after that?
> >
> > I find it strange defending Riemannian geometry because I
> > don't really like the geometrical interpretation of physics.
> > I don't believe in the "fabric" of spacetime, although it's
> > a fairly accurate model of reality.
>
> We know your reality

There is no "we" with Wozniak, so he is lying again, or he has
a mouse in his pocket.

> - you had to delete
> GPS clocks from it, as they didn't fit
> your sick delusions.

Wozniak can stuff his sick delusions up his butt.  Nobody cares
about his railings, lies and stupid dishonest questions.

> So, did maps exist before Riemann?

Like that one, for example.

And this nonsensical, moronic chattering:

> > > Another example of reality denying by
> > > Harrie, well known reality denier. You've
> > > got a direct link to Poincare's text.
> >
> > "To doubt everything or to believe everything are
> > two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the
> > necessity of reflection.
> > "Instead of a summary condemnation we should examine with
> > the utmost care the rôle of hypothesis"
>
> And:
> "Experiment no doubt teaches us that the sum of the
> angles of a triangle is equal to two right angles".
> Those idiocies of Earth maps allegedly denying that -
> were concocted later by relativistic doggies to
> excuse the madness of their idiot guru.

Silly, silly Wozzie-boy.  The sum of the angles of a
triangle on the earth's surface is NOT equal to two right
angles.  Wozzie-fool picked a quote which is demolished
by a simple test.

> > And Wozzie is the one who doubts
>
> Said Harrie, well known for his doubts.

Well, I certainly doubt that Wozzie-liar has an honest
brain-cell in his head.

> > ODD-Wozzie somehow believes that his link refutes
> > alternative geometries.
>
> A lie/slander again.
> Of course.

Okay, then Wozzie-liar believes in Riemannian geometry
and relativity.

"Never put both feet in your mouth at the same time, because
then you won't have a leg to stand on." -- Anon.

And he now believes that experimentalists are honest:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity

https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html

So he was lying when he wrote this:
> > > Your pathetic lies of zillions of experiments
> > > allegedly confirming self-denying mumble
> > > of your idiot guru are still irrelevant for
> > > the thread.
> >
> > ODD ADHD Wozzie is incompetent to read scientific text, let
> > alone understand it.  He goes through life arrogantly
> > believing he has done great things, but he's the only one
> > in the whole world that thinks so.
>
> Your spitting, lies and slanders help nothing.

Well, it sure doesn't help cure Wozzie'sADHD ODD mental
instability.  But I was hoping.

> The Shit of your idot guru was not even consistent
> and most of its so called "evidence" was doctored.

A lie, of course, concocted by fundamentally dishonest and
incompetent Wozzie-liar.  First he says there are no valid
geometries other than Euclidean, then he says there are
more, then he says now there aren't?  Wozzie is a very
sick soul.  Apparently, he's addicted to an endorphin boost
by arguing, insulting, lying and slandering.  He can go
pound sand.