| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<amsmath-20240731234952@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: How to read Web pages with funny backslashes?
Date: 31 Jul 2024 22:51:17 GMT
Organization: Stefan Ram
Lines: 15
Expires: 1 Jul 2025 11:59:58 GMT
Message-ID: <amsmath-20240731234952@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
References: <webpage-20240731143147@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <JavaScript-20240731145623@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <v8ee3h$k9gv$2@solani.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de aOoXbUda125svNmvxBp6lwm//6DzAZIkXenXTtygiu13gB
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XRyHiLqnNFT0Eua9JZxoS1yodiY= sha256:g1f7685cDggowyelyO3OGpejlSavzagzZF9K8ZDjeU0=
X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2024 Stefan Ram. All rights reserved.
Distribution through any means other than regular usenet
channels is forbidden. It is forbidden to publish this
article in the Web, to change URIs of this article into links,
and to transfer the body without this notice, but quotations
of parts in other Usenet posts are allowed.
X-No-Archive: Yes
Archive: no
X-No-Archive-Readme: "X-No-Archive" is set, because this prevents some
services to mirror the article in the web. But the article may
be kept on a Usenet archive server with only NNTP access.
X-No-Html: yes
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2215
nobody@nowhere.invalid (Marc Olschok) wrote or quoted:
>It is ordinary LaTeX inside the \[ ... \] marks (if you happen to use
>math.stackechange or mathoverflow ore the nlab etc. you probably have
>already seen this). The strange thing is that the & inside the matrix
>are replaced by the & , so they will display as & but of course not
>compile. I do not know if this is meant to be this way or an error on
>the web page.
Oh, that only happened because I showed the HTML source code
of the webpage in my second post. But the problem still exists
even if you replace "&" with "&".
In the meantime, I asked my buddy, the chatbot, to convert it
into acceptable LaTeX for me, and he nailed it! His trick? He
added a "\usepackage{amsmath}"!