Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<anfi+fboevoue6f-p5i0@wp.eu>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!nntp.comgw.net!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "A. Filip" <anfi@onionmail.org>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa,soc.culture.china
Subject: Re: Why =?utf-8?Q?Trump=E2=80=99s?= China trade war retreat may be
 fleeting
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 01:11:27 +0200
Organization: It is for me to know and for you to find out.
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <anfi+fboevoue6f-p5i0@wp.eu>
References: <27a201d341c4481c2d36e436877644fd@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 01:12:13 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="57145ee96df4cb8d0308037a800d6b36";
	logging-data="1310840"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+yB0xyT5wcSl6pp6qQQiWs"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vJrFnyYmXcTroJYP8pnVKbtUbkM=
	sha1:F3L7DHFB7u82RgltY8CNEJTdbGg=
X-Received-Bytes: 2115
Bytes: 2248

ltlee1@hotmail.com (ltlee1) wrote:
> From Asia Times
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Why Trump’s China trade war retreat may be fleeting
> If there’s anything that animates and activates the art-of-the-deal
> president, it’s being perceived as a negotiation loser
>
> by William Pesek May 13, 2025
> […]
> Trump and his surrogates are pretzeling themselves trying to spin this
> as anything other than a disastrous climbdown. But there’s just no way
> to sugarcoat the popping of champagne corks in Beijing today as Trump’s
> 145% tariffs are collapsed to 30% for at least 90 days.
> […]

145% tariffs make _some_ sense as the big show of the big stick before
going back to talking softly.  It makes _some_ sense in fixing the
single issue.  It makes even some sense in long term quite like
"be aware that Bush-3 may invade YOU".  Is it wise or _strategically_
cost effective? IMHO *NOT*.

You don't win battles to lose wars.

-- 
A. Filip
| "Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company."  (Mark Twain)