Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 07:01:51 +0000
Subject: Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
References: <pan$26699$6602b79b$4abe425a$df32a923@gnu.rocks>
 <_OmcnZpYmdE-PYX6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <wwvldyfmenf.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vfcjir$2gc7o$4@dont-email.me>
 <wwvv7xh1jee.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vfeh5a$2qk0v$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrnvhnn9i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <vfh570$3brp2$2@dont-email.me> <20241025153958.0000222f@gmail.com>
 <vfhbt5$3d372$2@dont-email.me> <vfhkm0$3i0mb$1@dont-email.me>
 <lo3dvqFo19fU2@mid.individual.net> <vfi017$3jf3g$4@dont-email.me>
From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
Organization: wokiesux
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2024 03:01:50 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vfi017$3jf3g$4@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <aq6dnU74jY9CDoH6nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@earthlink.com>
Lines: 17
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97
X-Trace: sv3-LsLeadrvBp9KTtvGVrJQAtjLlKcqGoiTxHL+bFY3HRMTwJd6vxXgM6WSbQ9vUPkalYxzR8pr4gja09S!8dCXugiQiru/VmQLjpD8YjNwJKA0gg7XaHET2b/G2U8mdiBL4P+3Ya2IuLcuyOfUaxjD19XsuJbr!02ZVf3/aEbEHIvMorvhh
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2301

On 10/26/24 1:51 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On 26 Oct 2024 05:45:31 GMT, rbowman wrote:
> 
>> About the time Heidegger asked 'Why are there beings at all rather than
>> nothing?' in 'Introduction to Metaphysics' my head started to hurt. That
>> was sentence 1, chapter 1. It didn't get better from there on.
> 
> Did he mention the Anthropic Principle at all?
> 
> That’s a controversial one. Fred Hoyle used it to predict the existence of
> an energetic state of the carbon atom without which heavier elements could
> not be synthesized.


   All philosophy is bullshit - including this philosophy  :-)