Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 03:12:28 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
References: <P8OcnfwhaeSXPiT-nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4kgh9$3i0t8$1@dont-email.me> <17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v4s1kl$1c3jr$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-B5B6C7.14031818062024@news.giganews.com> <v4t1nu$1ig6v$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-5889D5.18473418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4tfnl$1ons5$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-C71DF5.19385218062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8jq$23o16$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-A285B6.12133319062024@news.giganews.com> <v4vh5f$258cf$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-35247F.16282619062024@news.giganews.com> <v52kf9$2qv7o$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-3C4CB7.18492520062024@news.giganews.com> <v52nan$2v630$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-B6CEA3.21594220062024@news.giganews.com> <v54u4f$3bnc4$3@dont-email.me> <atropos-7C8365.12342525062024@news.giganews.com> <v5ff1u$1ns3d$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-A3B338.15513525062024@news.giganews.com> <v5fv2g$1uphg$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:10:05 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-082957.20100425062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 46
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-hYs2RrB94ED9sFNeWYXhY+ubdFW9bCM4hE2ctXhCKWtTD845rYdqgaOwI8PadamskIc1fK+ntgfJhvW!xy7URFjENK401xfSrctzmP5TZHi4TCxxMU+z9nMn7wqY6ZLora2RZgWDsQpbqRGhDfHRUBk4ai6S!53E=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3673

In article <v5fv2g$1uphg$2@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 6/25/2024 6:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v5ff1u$1ns3d$5@dont-email.me>,
> >   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/25/2024 3:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v54u4f$3bnc4$3@dont-email.me>,
> >>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 6/21/2024 12:59 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <v52nan$2v630$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> How are they substantively different, counselor?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> One's trigger is functioned only once, the other's trigger functions 
> >>>>>>> for every round fired.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope. Same single function.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Literally not. The firing mechanism inside the gun requires the trigger
> >>>>> go through its full cycle of function (depressed, released, and reset)
> >>>>> for every round fired in a semi-auto rifle. It's only activated once 
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> an entire burst in a machine gun.
> >>>>
> >>>> In both machine gun and bump-stock, the trigger cycle "consults" the
> >>>> shooter's finger during each cycle.  If there's pressure it fires, if
> >>>> not it stops.  For the shooter the guns are *functionally* identical.
> >>>
> >>> Which might be relevant if the NFA regulated firearms in any way, shape,
> >>> or form based on what it's like for the shooter. It does not therefore
> >>> it is not.
> >>
> >> You think "single function of the trigger" doesn't entail the shooter's
> >> experience of it?
>  >
> > No, it doesn't.
> 
> You mean, "Yes I do."

You keep telling me what I mean, but I assure you, Kreskin, that if I 
mean something I write it. If it's not in what I've written, it's not 
what I mean.