Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 01:34:44 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
References: <P8OcnfwhaeSXPiT-nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4i2m6$30bm2$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-25D624.12335314062024@news.giganews.com> <v4ih8u$336lr$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C652A7.15471614062024@news.giganews.com> <17d91fbd5fad865f$338100$533214$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> <v4kgh9$3i0t8$1@dont-email.me> <17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v4llgt$3s90d$1@dont-email.me> <17d97111755ab6ae$133791$675878$4ed50460@news.newsdemon.com> <v4s1q2$1c3jr$7@dont-email.me> <atropos-4879CF.14000618062024@news.giganews.com> <v4t1dt$1ig6v$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-10EF54.18431818062024@news.giganews.com> <v52jlr$2qnl3$7@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:32:02 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-0BD5BE.18320220062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 44
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-fas/hMgZSUikQ4cm+S8OIZCPtdy15F6De9OtgpiM52vrbGdaVqiYq/OjPSuRzhFElRS6TMUWdhkRtO0!G8eMIFaaPlnTV2LjD06/gcPngq74qapYxaywNiUX8FgiiH1nyyXOLPzvcUpxl7vCnv3SRiIYV0R4!tz0=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3467

In article <v52jlr$2qnl3$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 6/18/24 9:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v4t1dt$1ig6v$1@dont-email.me>,
> >   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/18/2024 5:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v4s1q2$1c3jr$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Maybe if we all chipped in a few bucks, Clarenzabell and Sammy Flagflyer
> >>>> would change their votes.
> >>>
> >>> Weird how Alito's flag also has flown over San Francisco's city hall for
> >>> more than half a century. Hardly a bastion of conservatism, San
> >>> Francisco. Yet when SF prog pols fly it, it's no big deal.
> >>>
> >>> https://ibb.co/S6wFxDy
> >>>
> >>> It was also used prominently by BLM during their 'mostly peaceful'
> >>> Summer of Love.
> >>>
> >>> https://ibb.co/Z8kvvMc
> >>>
> >>> So to recap: a flag when flown by leftist pols and far-left violent
> >>> communist protest groups is totes cool, but the moment a conservative
> >>> raises it on his private property, he should be impeached and removed
> >>> from office.
> >>
> >> Yes, we hold a Supreme Court Justice to a stricter standard of
> >> impartiality than we do an organization like BLM.  Life's unfair...
> > 
> > Government officials are government officials. If it's not a problem for
> > the ones in San Francisco to fly it, it's not a problem for any official
> > to fly it.
> > 
> Do they still fly it? And if not, why not?

I have no idea. I haven't been to San Francisco in several years. But 
they flew it for 60 years. If it was the appalling affront to democracy, 
apple pie, and tiny, tiny babies that you act like it is, why were the 
good little progs of San Francisco flying it over the sacred halls of 
government there for more than a half a century?