Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 01:50:23 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
References: <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v4s1kl$1c3jr$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-B5B6C7.14031818062024@news.giganews.com> <v4t1nu$1ig6v$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-5889D5.18473418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4tfnl$1ons5$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-C71DF5.19385218062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8jq$23o16$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-A285B6.12133319062024@news.giganews.com> <v4vh5f$258cf$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-35247F.16282619062024@news.giganews.com> <s6077jpsl679hmse4jdbsf9eg38a9pf6qt@4ax.com> <v52ki8$2qv7o$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:47:42 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-0C76E1.18474220062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 46
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-yWSGJVDa1nd3sq4cH7t0F106XlisOQvbR5hw1HE69RK0w77Ta4RNm8Rjz3SS5dojVkj8YsBS0+IZGdx!loqlETEbmddkZG3SrgP3abr4BiSznf9xBZmLVzGSsERUp+zRSujnWRd5iW922I28NQ2IhcYRJ18H!y+c=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3690

In article <v52ki8$2qv7o$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 6/19/24 9:10 PM, shawn wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:28:26 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> In article <v4vh5f$258cf$2@dont-email.me>,
> >> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> >>> Machine gun:
> >>>
> >>> "...any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily
> >>> restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual
> >>> reloading, by a single function of the trigger."
> >>>
> >>> Now, tell me again how either gun in my video doesn't qualify...
> >>
> >> Because with the bump stock, it's only firing one shot per pull of the
> >> trigger. The trigger is just being pulled repeatedly really fast as a
> >> result of rebounding recoil caused by the bump stock. The bumper rocks
> >> the rifle back and forth against the shooter's trigger finger, causing a
> >> separate trigger pull each time. The statute you quoted above clearly
> >> says "by a SINGLE function of the trigger". If you shoot 100 rounds with
> >> a bump stock, you've got 100 functions of the trigger, not a single
> >> function of the trigger.
> > 
> > Yes, you are definitely technically correct. (The best kind.) That
> > said you can see why people consider the bump stock to be the
> > equivalent of turning a weapon into an equal to a machine gun. It
> > isn't a machine gun but it ends throwing lead down field much like
> > one. I think eventually the law will be updated to include bump stocks
> > but who knows how long that will take. As no one who was involved in
> > writing the original act likely foresaw the possibility of a bump
> > stock.
> > 
> Both still require the same action. A single trigger pull, with 
> constant pressure.

Which isn't the standard under the law. The law's standard is a "single 
function of the trigger". As I said above, if you shoot 100 rounds with 
a bump stock, you've got 100 functions of the trigger, not a single 
function of the trigger.

A semi-auto rifle physically can't fire more than one round with a 
single function of the trigger. It's impossible for a semi-auto rifle to 
meet the definition of "machine gun" under the NFA.