Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:39:16 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
References: <B7WcnT_drY_sm-_7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me> <273351066.740513925.531451.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <v51hle$2kkd7$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:36:36 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-295153.09363520062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 36
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-5VSyTjdVQvYPH9pPVQLUR6HS3NHLw/uX333ZgM7uSWIJMCZ7rZycKVzYFbcY6C5wDmB2OPxtOkMfLoc!YR5+tUGmW8wwBoUdXMf9bZGGXjzdKi5rddmTt7mBAg336JVfoyuBtsNMSp0QDiQXVRMfu8FopSp8!OhU=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2714

In article <v51hle$2kkd7$1@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 6/20/2024 1:03 AM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> > moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>> "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions
> >>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice protesters
> >>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.
> >>>>
> >>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened.
> >>>>
> >>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were
> >>>> trespassing.
> >>>
> >>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing it for
> >>> 'social justice'.
> >>
> >> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
> >> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?
> > 
> > They broke through a locked gate to get into the neighborhood and
> > lied that it was simply their route to get somewhere else because
> > there's only the one way in and out of the community. So they weren't
> > passing through. They broke and entered.
> 
> Then, sure, I'd be royally pissed, too ...but still must ask whether 
> deadly force is an appropriate threat to protect one's lawn.

We don't decide appropriateness in the criminal courts. We decide 
whether conduct violates the law.