Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:31:23 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
References: <P8OcnfwhaeSXPiT-nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4i2m6$30bm2$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-25D624.12335314062024@news.giganews.com> <v4ih8u$336lr$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C652A7.15471614062024@news.giganews.com> <17d91fbd5fad865f$338100$533214$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> <v4kgh9$3i0t8$1@dont-email.me> <17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v4llgt$3s90d$1@dont-email.me> <17d97111755ab6ae$133791$675878$4ed50460@news.newsdemon.com> <v4s1q2$1c3jr$7@dont-email.me> <atropos-4879CF.14000618062024@news.giganews.com> <v4t1dt$1ig6v$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-10EF54.18431818062024@news.giganews.com> <v52jlr$2qnl3$7@dont-email.me> <atropos-0BD5BE.18320220062024@news.giganews.com> <v52n0u$2v630$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-76DC0A.22083520062024@news.giganews.com> <v56pju$3qb1e$3@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:29:01 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-2EB311.12290125062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 82
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-V1aCHYANYsKuoviEjcG/J6C9RbgJ/Hrrbnc/AIm5D+y1XGnCRVZr1u8CSLrbIeCDCVY4O7YC5y/bv7a!dR9E0Q6Cipf/RGpgs4yS+/E/gS/APirX5Cfo901mF+Q4MXLs+CxKBfs87MPV7bP1QnrhoJ2FqOqR!Fu8=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 5202

In article <v56pju$3qb1e$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 6/21/24 1:08 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v52n0u$2v630$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/20/24 9:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v52jlr$2qnl3$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 6/18/24 9:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <v4t1dt$1ig6v$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>     moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 6/18/2024 5:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <v4s1q2$1c3jr$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maybe if we all chipped in a few bucks, Clarenzabell and Sammy
> >>>>>>>> Flagflyer would change their votes.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Weird how Alito's flag also has flown over San Francisco's city hall
> >>>>>>> for more than half a century. Hardly a bastion of conservatism, San
> >>>>>>> Francisco. Yet when SF prog pols fly it, it's no big deal.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://ibb.co/S6wFxDy
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It was also used prominently by BLM during their 'mostly peaceful'
> >>>>>>> Summer of Love.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://ibb.co/Z8kvvMc
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So to recap: a flag when flown by leftist pols and far-left violent
> >>>>>>> communist protest groups is totes cool, but the moment a conservative
> >>>>>>> raises it on his private property, he should be impeached and removed
> >>>>>>> from office.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes, we hold a Supreme Court Justice to a stricter standard of
> >>>>>> impartiality than we do an organization like BLM.  Life's unfair...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Government officials are government officials. If it's not a problem
> >>>>> for the ones in San Francisco to fly it, it's not a problem for any
> >>>>> official to fly it.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Do they still fly it? And if not, why not?
> >>>
> >>> I have no idea. I haven't been to San Francisco in several years. But
> >>> they flew it for 60 years. If it was the appalling affront to democracy,
> >>> apple pie, and tiny, tiny babies that you act like it is, why were the
> >>> good little progs of San Francisco flying it over the sacred halls of
> >>> government there for more than a half a century?
> >>>
> >> Then shut the fuck up about it if you admit you don't know what you're
> >> talking about today.
> > 
> > It's apparent you have no answer to the question asked and no, I won't
> > "shut the fuck up" about anything. I'll speak about whatever I want,
> > whenever I want and I certainly don't need your permission to do so.
> > 
> > 60 years, Effa. 60 years.
> > 
> > And don't forget those BLMers. I guess we finally have proof they were
> > insurrectionists all along, since only insurrectionists fly that flag.
> > 
> I gave you an answer. Either you didn't like it, or you couldn't grasp it.

No, I asked you:

"If it was the appalling affront to democracy, apple pie, and tiny, tiny 
babies that you act like it is, why were the good little progs of San 
Francisco flying it over the sacred halls of government there for more 
than a half a century?"

And you just told me to "shut the fuck up about it". That's not an 
answer to the question posed to you.

That's a dodge and an evasion.

> MAGA co-opted the flag

One guy waving it at one protest does not a "co-opt" make, you dipshit.