Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<atropos-4A3657.22360730042024@news.giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 05:27:01 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Far-Left Host Sunny Hostin Makes Numerous False Claims About Pro-Hamas Protests
References: <v0qn1s$2erfu$3@dont-email.me> <3sCdnVVUnp0u3qz7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <cbh33jln575698uh4qhllair5o8iogj9rm@4ax.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 22:36:07 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-4A3657.22360730042024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 29
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-JYUW+Gk0QGMPPB6f4dmSC6SQKxyV00FMIcU1rG47NptFf+xHMeFC0OcmyFyZHVhmTI+S8e+RvgeH5+Z!8yIBqnehPnxhQWaGe+b6qnMiy3kNM1xgIPVOzit4vgoYrbrm6NUSORwmx0TWN407HCN9mRgUkT7+!7YI=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2296

In article <cbh33jln575698uh4qhllair5o8iogj9rm@4ax.com>,
 The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 19:17:07 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Apr 30, 2024 at 1:30:52 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> >
> >I don't remember any legacy media handwringing about how to "balance the
> >1st Amendment rights" of the January 6 protestors with the rule of law.
> >Also, despite a mob breaking into a public building and destroying or
> >vandalizing public property, the media is still determined to categorize
> >these college uprisings as protests rather than riots or insurrections.
> >
> >And say what you want about the January 6ers, but at least the flags they 
> >were waving that day were U.S. flags.
> >
> (1) I wouldn't put that as a point in their favor

I would.

> (2) What makes you think the pro-HAMAS demonstrators aren't destroying
> and vandalizing public property?

They are. That was my point. Despite the media continuing to refer to 
them as peaceful protests, there's been both violence and significant 
property damage.

> I shall not be responsible for my actions if I hear them described as
> "mostly peaceful"...