Path: ...!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:10:23 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
References: <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v51ik8$2kkd7$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-696A04.09292320062024@news.giganews.com> <v5203r$2n6c1$3@dont-email.me> <1oucnSmdyL0VBun7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v52knn$2qv7o$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-7D5EFE.19185120062024@news.giganews.com> <v56pft$3qb1e$2@dont-email.me> <lTSdnT7Heb6bc-v7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <v56rdi$3qngn$2@dont-email.me> <qpWdnXeHkrbQbuv7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v5mjv0$3cvu7$3@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:07:52 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-52908B.09075228062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-zSHo/rkKCCSCg0z7tSm4QuF7w/+4VPCSoZMxcpMJAOOEmLOljYM44drpS1rZBwUpOMsWvQF1CaKFz+o!R/aGjdtjVlZ5Fr0NnawoOYupGtAFXPhip3yd2CYL7E9sn+sqCJAN9pHUuQP70+JRrsr/9bNrheTG!MlQ=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2969

In article <v5mjv0$3cvu7$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 6/22/24 11:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/22/24 11:30 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>>> They decide law based on intent all the time. It's a staple of the 
> >>>> system.
> >>>
> >>> Cool! Let's go with intent, then. Which means all those millions of
> >>> illegals pretending to be refugees and just reciting the magic words to
> >>> game the system can be summarily denied and deported because the intent 
> >>> of the refugee law was never to allow millions of people who don't
> >>> qualify as refugees to game and overwhelm the system and flood
> >>> unchecked into the country.
> >>>
> >>> Regardless of what the law actually says, its intent was never to
> >>> create the current border crisis we're currently experiencing, so we
> >>> can ignore what's written and just go with intent.
> >>>
> >>> I'm really starting to warm up to The Law According to Effa!
> >>>
> >>>> What do you think the Supreme Court uses to judge whether a law is
> >>>> constitutional?
> >>>
> >>> Umm... the Constitution.
> >>
> >> Ummm... pass the border bill your side wrote.
> > 
> > No need. We already have the intent of the Immigration and Naturalization
> > Act!
> > 
> Then why hasn't anyone said that, besides you?

Because deciding cases based on intent isn't really a thing. Something I 
was trying to illustrate with sarcasm.

You're now actually making my case for me. Well done!