Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:11:54 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
References: <B7WcnT_drY_sm-_7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:09:16 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-542467.12091619062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 40
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-gKxO3VSrPuJYa188elBi/PNgH2sfUgITKLEa4KEpMtMfcjOu5ryDx6rf8ypWRnJWvHZN784FGSn4diM!sDLAwyRSZca+ZSgICtBMPqL3NYuqQ6gvtKbjcILQbxQeUs7gTrBQF+56v0UIWK/bSq6Q9bhC/Nt2!zI8=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2739

In article <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>,
 moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

> On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>,
> >   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>    "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions
> >>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice protesters
> >>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.
> >>>>
> >>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened.
> >>>>
> >>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were
> >>>> trespassing.
> >>>
> >>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing it for
> >>> 'social justice'.
> >>
> >> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
> >> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?
> > 
> > Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private
> > residential neighborhood.
> 
> Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground

Why would you presume that?

> I'd say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, etc.

I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come onto my 
private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's 
allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition.