Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 01:38:10 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Criminal Records Expunged for St. Louis Gun Couple
References: <B7WcnT_drY_sm-_7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-1CD7DC.18410418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-DE6AC6.09273119062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-542467.12091619062024@news.giganews.com> <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:35:28 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-597F57.18352820062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 52
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-yrtZgI/PYri8gAAvI5jN3svlOlQ8wX2OXvGFqbcNkBtZ3T5FlycF+QfqH7ikrfN/WKq7Ud203mPrGup!46wfjoCctWxN90zHP19hjTcb4Qg+ECCTpf50RxywSzt9yTlyWRPFvOi13Ar7wI2A9PK3SsUQ/Lxf!y+k=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3329

In article <v52l9a$2qv7o$10@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 6/19/24 3:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <v4v8ug$23o16$2@dont-email.me>,
> >   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 6/19/2024 12:27 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <v4uvta$21spc$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>    moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 6/18/2024 9:41 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <v4t2ai$1imbc$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>     "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ST. LOUIS (AP) - A judge has expunged the misdemeanor convictions
> >>>>>>> of a St. Louis couple who waved guns at racial injustice protesters
> >>>>>>> outside their mansion in 2020. Now they want their guns back.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I had no idea that four years later, this still hadn't happened.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It was a gated community, which are all over St. Louis. They were
> >>>>>> trespassing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Apparently 'trespassing' is a meaningless term when you're doing it for
> >>>>> 'social justice'.
> >>>>
> >>>> Don't you even *pretend* there's a built-in tug-of-war between
> >>>> "trespassing" and "peaceable assembly"?
> >>>
> >>> Maybe in a public place like a university quad, but not in a private
> >>> residential neighborhood.
> >>
> >> Under the presumption that each point of view must give some ground
> > 
> > Why would you presume that?
> > 
> >> I'd say that the protesters' rights depend on history, geometry, etc.
> > 
> > I'd say (and I'd be right) that no protester has rights to come onto my
> > private property at all. I'm the only one who gets to decide who's
> > allowed and who isn't. It's pretty much in the definition.
> > 
> They were in the street, not on McClosky's property.

The street was private property, too, smooth brain.

And there's nothing wrong with indicating to a screaming mob that's 
already trespassed on private property what will happen to them if they 
trespass any further.