Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<atropos-638F7C.12321211032024@ec2-18-101-80-69.eu-south-2.compute.amazonaws.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.27.MISMATCH!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 19:25:28 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Biden To Deploy U.S. Military To Gaza To Help The Palestinians: Report
References: <usevpt$1m3o8$3@dont-email.me> <atropos-819800.11555208032024@news.giganews.com> <usgdhn$2079n$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F403B1.19081708032024@news.giganews.com> <uskdm2$30432$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-0BC399.11050610032024@news.giganews.com> <17bb80004f59a21f$3$856620$cd54664@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-03BC13.13372910032024@ec2-18-101-80-69.eu-south-2.compute.amazonaws.com> <17bb85b615b2ae7e$55$3602787$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-D6FB9D.15234210032024@ec2-18-101-80-69.eu-south-2.compute.amazonaws.com> <usmtsm$3k3rf$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:32:12 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-638F7C.12321211032024@ec2-18-101-80-69.eu-south-2.compute.amazonaws.com>
Lines: 71
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-rcFcudZdBphy6glvW1CrW5RhpVSNvhlY6zUHvJMuq6B+Qas63iJAYe9A58o1fw/8lHz/6Yjc2uSOx4l!fRpQaz+DG9/v4eSD9su1gKwZXm2Kblo5/pM0pCDjBR03ObC+U+Jq3+M7SupxHRlHVblJCnrlOen7!a3ukWjbyiotaO2DzbXChVK+VXXZghFPFuHZTHYNfvq7/Rw==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4899

In article <usmtsm$3k3rf$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 3/10/24 6:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <17bb85b615b2ae7e$55$3602787$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>,
> >   moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 3/10/2024 4:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <17bb80004f59a21f$3$856620$cd54664@news.newsdemon.com>,
> >>>    moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/10/2024 3:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <uskdm2$30432$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 3/8/24 10:08 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <usgdhn$2079n$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> > 
> >>>>>>>> Pretend all you like, we had a solution to the border problem.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Allowing up to 8500 illegals per day to continue to flow unvetted 
> >>>>>>> into the country isn't a solution to the border problem under any 
> >>>>>>> definition of 'solution' in the English-speaking world, other than,
> >>>>>>> I suppose, it would be legalized under this bill so I guess you
> >>>>>>> could claim they can't be illegals if their entry was legalized
> >>>>>>> and that would give a victory in the language war.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Again, Republicans put together a fix for the border.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Again, continuing to allow thousands of illegals unrestricted access to
> >>>>> the nation is not a 'fix'. It's just leaving everything broken and
> >>>>> pretending you fixed it.
> >>>>
> >>>> You *DO* understand that, even if the bill had hermetically sealed the
> >>>> border and deported all current non-legals, it would *STILL* have been
> >>>> shot down like an escaping doe.  Not sure you should be celebrating...
> >>>
> >>> And if such a bill had been shot down by Republicans, I'd be the first
> >>> one bitching about them for doing it.
> >>>
> >>> But in this case, shooting it down was the right move, even if some of
> >>> them had dubious motives for doing so.
> >>
> >> (You misspelled "most all".)
> >>
> >> You're calling it the "right move" as though any reason other than sheer
> >> political pusillanimity underlay it
> > 
> > I don't care why they did it, I'm just glad that it was rejected. That
> > bill was an abomination that would only have legalized the massive
> > migrant hordes' flow into this country.
> > 
> >> Trump's a fucking dictator flexing his politburo, and that's hard to see
> >> past.
> > 
> > Be that as it may, the nation dodged a bullet by rejecting that abortion
> > masquerading as 'border security'.
> > 
> > I sure as hell wouldn't want them to vote *for* such appalling
> > legislation to the detriment of America merely to stick a thumb in
> > Trump's eye.

> Then why did the most conservative Republicans craft the bill, and 
> praise it to high heaven?

Because he's a politician and lying in his own self-interest is what a 
politician reflexively does.

Just like lying to win on Usenet on any given day is what you 
reflexively do.