Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 03:42:59 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: If Biden Loses Televised Debate, Can He Be Replaced?
References: <v5jusu$2pmlu$1@dont-email.me> <17dd712e093e033e$4759$3767249$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com> <vwSdnaUXHeafQBz7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vjn38jp2gpse1essga7hbglilult4tnfu4@4ax.com> <PCudncK6nb8Ofxz7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <39p38jhnhvj2mjdj49e7ca4v97fpfd8in4@4ax.com> <IQydnduIEa-YdBz7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <6j748j91cj94cs9t35eipapqd3ucaltjbt@4ax.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:40:19 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-68FBCD.20401930062024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 66
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-2SfOlEUCZOrKVB2Paabr2oXjntg00AHmzMwy8lqPX8h+FLV3/K3YQp+9sBx0EGasYVwxfnIT6YcTY7n!SgkHOT3zyN0B3ZZjsA+gyCGwEcrlYu4etsstd5HAXQLZDMZscC2a9OFzXK9xnBdPFnwXa5jHW1Jh!DnA=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4251

In article <6j748j91cj94cs9t35eipapqd3ucaltjbt@4ax.com>,
 shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 23:23:49 +0000, BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
> >shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:56:19 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Jun 30, 2024 at 3:40:41 PM PDT, "shawn" 
> >>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:32:34 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Jun 29, 2024 at 2:57:55 AM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> On 6/28/24 10:49 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <i18t7jdt9idsgamt2nrt6dctolugp38s76@4ax.com>,
> >>>>>>> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:01:49 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> Earlier this month, Business Insider offered these possible
> >>>>>>>>> replacements for Biden should he not be the nominee: Kamala
> >>>>>>>>> Harris, governors Gavin Newsom (D-CA), Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI),
> >>>>>>>>> Roy Cooper (D-N.C.), and Wes Moore (D-MD), and senators Amy
> >>>>>>>>> Klobuchar (D-MN) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.)
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> The knives are out already.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Gavvy Newsom and Hillary were probably watching the debate from their
> >>>>>>> respective lairs and whispering "Excellent" over their tented fingers 
> >>>>>>> in their best Monty Burns voice.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> What did they say after your guy Trump claimed (again) that Dems want 
> >>>>>> to kill babies after they're born?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Leftists like Hutt are calling what Trump said about "post-birth" 
> >>>>> abortions and Ralph Northam a lie. Here's then-governor of Virginia
> >>>>> Northam in his own words. You tell me what he's talking about if
> >>>>> Trump was lying.
> >>>> 
> >>>> So that one guy represents all Dems?
> >>> 
> >>> Trump specifically said Northam wanted post-birth abortions. Leftists 
> >>> went nuts and said that was a lie.
> >>> 
> >>> If it's a lie, what is Northam talking about there?
> >> 
> >> My point is Trump keeps saying Democrats want post-birth abortions.
> >> It's not Democrats, but at most one Democrat that said such a thing.
> >
> >Gavvy Newsom has also made similar remarks. He's talked about amending the
> >California penal code so that such post-birth abortions won't fall under
> >the definition of murder, which killing a living baby outside the womb most
> >certainly is.
> 
> If the doctors, and the mother think a baby isn't viable is it really
> that wrong to terminate the baby's life? That's not an abortion. It's
> the so called mercy killing but one that is or should be done within
> the law.

So it's okay to kill retarded people because they won't have a full life 
anyway and they'll just be burden on the parents?