Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:18:30 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me> <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-79E7CE.10142621032024@news.giganews.com> <17bf2142c28c7c76$917$1588242$4cd50660@news.newsdemon.com> <sR2dnWtJhaBZdmD4nZ2dnZfqnPUAAAAA@giganews.com> <17bf328db608e354$2$3384359$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:26:08 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-7FAF8C.14260822032024@news.giganews.com>
Lines: 60
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-pXRud3rEiJCfpAXvstXgEYtu0WDeRcuy9uvo4UG0lWuhcHsLvkvuckVAXZRV24ApU1vg5qGpGriaGKk!yflu4H8UQJaJa32nnp2tzf2U31um+BikrXu8dfd80NS8xofWFCkHGehsIr6KMct+ZdMOh2UIR1HP!idc=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3964

In article <17bf328db608e354$2$3384359$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com>,
 moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:

> On 3/22/2024 4:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > On Mar 22, 2024 at 8:55:51 AM PDT, "moviePig" <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 3/21/2024 1:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>   In article <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>,
> >>>     moviePig <never@nothere.com> wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>>   On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote:
> >>>>>   On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
> >>>>>>   On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>>   On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman""
> >>>>>>>   <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>   BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>   Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s
> >>>>>>>>>   <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>   On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>   What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still
> >>>>>>>>>>>   unauthorized?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for 
> >>>>>>>>> people who were later found guilty of unauthorized entry.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How does that logically hold up?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
> >>>>>>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and 
> >>>>>>>> judge were obligated to do so.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number
> >>>>>>> of people who were there that day but for those to whom it did 
> >>>>>>> apply, it seems that as a matter of law one cannot be guilty of 
> >>>>>>> unauthorized entry if the people in charge of authorizing you let
> >>>>>>> you in.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Indeed. Not if one remains in the area he was let into.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries
> >>>>> sure didn't.

> >>>> I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that 
> >>>> a couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in. But what I
> >>>> was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building 
> >>>> doesn't equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.
> >>>   
> >>> Which would be relevant if the people who were let in were actually the
> >>> desk-shitters.
> >>
> >> So, the guilt-threshold requires matching a rioter's DNA to his feces?
> > 
> > It requires matching the crime to the actual person who did it.
> 
> So, the getaway-car driver *isn't* guilty of killing the bank teller?

Depends on the state.