Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 20:26:21 +0000 From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-C514B8.15165012052024@news.giganews.com> <v1rhbi$31ea6$1@dont-email.me> <pAadnbLSD9TW19z7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-F73D18.19593612052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-FDC779.10472413052024@news.giganews.com> <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 13:35:19 -0700 Message-ID: <atropos-859A07.13351913052024@news.giganews.com> Lines: 64 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-j4Cz2/piTM3w1SDiRmYpQbp8ast+F4/lJBoSSnuU53EFpqBJ5xWXEBfD0g1PsByNsABULj0CY9iFEau!mGEl0GKd7gL00QdTkuAfhGgIlDiOxLFdr+uglA1iAYcmCWNI8WcPPD81iDu4GcTARNhCebWc+Uj+!qzg= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4221 In article <v1tp0v$3krav$1@dont-email.me>, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > > In article <v1tb17$3hi6h$1@dont-email.me>, > > moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > > > >> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> In article <v1rtuq$37l07$1@dont-email.me>, > >>> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>> In article <v1lpp9$1gnv5$1@dont-email.me>, > >>>>>>> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of > >>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that > >>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the > >>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she > >>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that > >>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the > >>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have > >>>>>> said. > >>>>> > >>>>> How about the truth? > >>>> > >>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* > >>>> carries some risk. > >>> > >>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that > >>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population. > >>> > >>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective". > >>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested > >>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.) > >> > >> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And > >> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told. > > > > So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own > > good. > > > >> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, > >> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to > >> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation. > > Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have > to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe. Except for the people who were injured by it.