Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:28:35 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Baltimore Bridge
References: <54ecndjJKpe_QZn7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <66n90j98fa5ciafo546pd0t1fk7iasml2r@4ax.com> <uu2nbv$3b5vs$1@dont-email.me> <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-F8737E.11425728032024@news.giganews.com> <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me> <atropos-0FE527.10455929032024@news.giganews.com> <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-1BE492.12585230032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad> <atropos-9A18E6.14101830032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 13:36:15 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-AFA6ED.13361531032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net>
Lines: 98
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-rOviR/SG/4fKKbuLZnXfgjebcs5MUPJqkNrkkesAk4Rdqs8txfUImEwLG/PxbR3cjDBAjgdJf3RSdg6!X8tNiWwfQ7+LBMKnaGq8szQ3sH5mp3DL5JC6qCwX30mahzcBmH0n9KpsRSHXompVmKZSekePsDg+!cKi0F4+SC95BaJu0A+BpEVw/
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 5863

In article <uubnl9$1q8ej$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On 3/30/24 5:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> > In article <hA_NN.733321$xHn7.585962@fx14.iad>,
> >   trotsky <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On 3/30/24 2:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>> In article <uu9csk$1363u$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/29/24 1:45 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>> In article <uu6im7$b577$8@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 3/28/24 2:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <uu4adb$3mth9$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>      "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:55:30 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> 
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Just saw on the news that Joe Biden has pledged that the 
> >>>>>>>>>>> government will "pay the entire cost" of rebuilding the
> >>>>>>>>>>> Baltimore bridge.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Huh? Shouldn't the shipping company and its insurance agency foot
> >>>>>>>>>>> the bill? It's like he just can't wait for any opportunity to 
> >>>>>>>>>>> fuck the taxpayer.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> And when it's rebuilt, obviously it can't be renamed the Francis
> >>>>>>>>>>> Scott Key Bridge. I mean, "old straight racist white guy", 
> >>>>>>>>>>> amirite? So what will its new name be?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I submit the "Saint George Floyd of Fentanyl Memorial Bridge".
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The federal government can act to get repairs started today while
> >>>>>>>>>> the lawyers act to collect any money due from the 
> >>>>>>>>>> company/insurance.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The bridge won't be repaired. It'll be 5 to 7 years at least.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Here's an article from the Baltimore Sun. Turn off javascript to 
> >>>>>>>> read.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://www.baltimoresun.com/2024/03/27/how-long-to-rebuild-key-bridg
> >>>>>>>> e/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ignore "rebuild" in the headline. No one is saying it can be 
> >>>>>>>> rebuilt. It's going to be replaced with something brand new. I'm
> >>>>>>>> sure the piers will both be relocated closer to shore.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And higher, too. I drove across the Key Bridge regularly when I was a
> >>>>>>> DC denizen and it was kinda scary how high up you got with seemingly
> >>>>>>> very little to stop you from going over the side if you lost control.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The replacement will have to take into account larger vessels and 
> >>>>>>>> sea level rise
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Which is non-existent pretty much everywhere. There's been no sea 
> >>>>>>> level rise over the last 12 years at the beach down the street from
> >>>>>>> me; when I visited Miami's South Beach two years ago, the ocean was
> >>>>>>> in the same place it was in the pictures of my visit 20 years earlier
> >>>>>>> (despite AlGore's insistence that Miami would be underwater by 2011);
> >>>>>>> Plymouth Rock isn't underwater; the water level around the base of
> >>>>>>> the Statue of Liberty hasn't changed since it was erected, etc., etc.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This has been explained to you for decades. Decades...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Liar.
> >>>
> >>>> Over and over and over and you still repeat the same old bullshit as
> >>>> everything around us goes to shit.
> >>>
> >>> Given that the enviro-kooks have been predicting sea level rise since
> >>> the late 90s, even famously direly warning that Miami would be
> >>> underwater by 2011,
> >>
> >> Shockingly I googled this and it returned zero hits.
> > 
> > Google Search is run by an AI that doesn't even recognize the existence
> > of white people. The Agenda is baked into its algorithms. Its search
> > results are no longer worthy of trust and confidence.
> > 
> > Regardless, I can't believe you even needed to check Google to see
> > whether the enviro-loons have been screeching about sea level rise. It's
> > kinda one of their articles of faith, Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket.
> > 
> You've been told this for decades.

You're claiming I've been told for decades that Hutt couldn't find 
anything about enviro-kooks pushing sea-level rise on Google?

Do tell...

(Your bullshit doesn't even make coherent sense anymore.)