Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <atropos-B11824.13062031032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<atropos-B11824.13062031032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!69.80.99.22.MISMATCH!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 19:58:40 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 'OT] Are you ready for rain tax?
References: <20240330210810.00007f2e@example.com> <uuafac$1eqfr$1@dont-email.me> <1321521463.733557214.925860.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <20240331141729.00002027@example.com> <uucaml$1ultn$1@dont-email.me> <uucbis$1ure2$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X)
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2024 13:06:20 -0700
Message-ID: <atropos-B11824.13062031032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net>
Lines: 37
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-U0ZZ/7zbELBWwydX1BrOLhkSybbtekgoGT5DBCvguU+fbDI3LZ2ClXXX0PamVnhoDqA6CvAcI3QWjBR!PjURPegcCWDsKhP3uA+MOn9Hn8qT7QHzhdJ1gXQRhtGo95/JjEACcuu3fDyGVabyA3gXu8ovsZfY!/iApC7PsrMgB9ePdy/ZlzkXG
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3323

In article <uucbis$1ure2$1@dont-email.me>,
 Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

> On 3/31/2024 11:40 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> > Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
> >> Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:06:46 -0700 anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>:
> > 
> >>>> . . .
> >   
> >>> My ex has a swimming pool and a lot of foliage in their backyard.
> >>> Every year they have to go down and protest their gigantic sewer bill
> >>> – thousands of dollars – that is based on the assumption that all
> >>> water used goes down the drain.  They assess us something like one
> >>> sixth our water bill for sewer.
> > 
> >> That is truly depraved! Surely, there is some evaporation from the
> >> pool and the rest of the water stays in the pool. Charging them as if it
> >> went down the drain is obscene. Has anyone ever tried to fight this?
> > 
> > How? Taxes and fees have do not measure consumption nor benefit and they
> > are never fair. It's fairly common that sewer charges are simply
> > surcharges on water bills. The fact that water exiting the house into
> > the main drain to the sanitary sewer isn't measured is of no interest.
> > 
> > There's typically a second surcharge for "infiltration" which is all the
> > water that enters the sanitary sewer that cannot be related to water
> > bills. That has absolutely nothing to do with you.
> 
> The really stupid part of all this is they should have simply increased 
> the sewage fee WITHOUT saying "this is a new charge for being rained 
> on".  People would have grumbled for a bit and paid but the way this was 
> handled apparently comes across as a punishment for the weather.
> 
> Thought, would this new "rain tax" apply to a home lot entirely covered 
> by a geodesic dome, diverting away before it reaches the property?  :P

Okay, settle down, Mr. Burns.